There's so many things they're distracting from. Yes the Maxwell trial, but they have to keep the news on a racial narrative to follow the news of the Rittenhouse trial, which itself was most likely meant to go a different way and be politically utilized. OSHA mandates falling through, cases rising among vaxxed, gotta keep the covidians occupied.
They have a new narrative to bring about now that covid is turning, and they need time to solidify it. Be it climate change, small pox, whatever.
I can't understand how people can think the DS are powerful enough to pull off pandemics and presidential elections, but things like this just whoops...
Individual situations are much harder to manipulate than large scale situations that can be hidden behind a multitude of faces and opinions. I mean sure maybe it was highly manipulated to the point that the questions it brought about were meant to spur on outcomes I haven't anticipated.(always division based of course though) or maybe it wasn't, and the msm focused so heavily on it as a random piece of "actual" news (that'd be rich)
Sure I could piece together a long theory on why it "seemed" not to go how it was intended, but actually did. But as it stands I'm holding out anything firm until I see what sorta piles the dust settles into.
Let's bring up vaccines as an example. From both sides. One side says "but hey this person and this person died!" The other says "but this person and this person had no problems!" People can transfer the focus across entire populations. That's a lot different than "hey the FBI withheld hi def drone footage" vs "yea but he shot two black people".
There's a lot more room for scrutiny on an individual basis, and a lot more room for shifting the conversation elsewhere on a group basis.
Hurt durrr. And you realize that drowning an individual situation in a SEA of individual situations makes it much easier to gloss over the inconsistencies in one of the multitude, right?
There's so many things they're distracting from. Yes the Maxwell trial, but they have to keep the news on a racial narrative to follow the news of the Rittenhouse trial, which itself was most likely meant to go a different way and be politically utilized. OSHA mandates falling through, cases rising among vaxxed, gotta keep the covidians occupied. They have a new narrative to bring about now that covid is turning, and they need time to solidify it. Be it climate change, small pox, whatever.
I can't understand how people can think the DS are powerful enough to pull off pandemics and presidential elections, but things like this just whoops...
Individual situations are much harder to manipulate than large scale situations that can be hidden behind a multitude of faces and opinions. I mean sure maybe it was highly manipulated to the point that the questions it brought about were meant to spur on outcomes I haven't anticipated.(always division based of course though) or maybe it wasn't, and the msm focused so heavily on it as a random piece of "actual" news (that'd be rich)
Sure I could piece together a long theory on why it "seemed" not to go how it was intended, but actually did. But as it stands I'm holding out anything firm until I see what sorta piles the dust settles into.
You understand that large scale situations are made up of multiple individiual situations, right?
Let's bring up vaccines as an example. From both sides. One side says "but hey this person and this person died!" The other says "but this person and this person had no problems!" People can transfer the focus across entire populations. That's a lot different than "hey the FBI withheld hi def drone footage" vs "yea but he shot two black people".
There's a lot more room for scrutiny on an individual basis, and a lot more room for shifting the conversation elsewhere on a group basis.
I feel like this is a pretty basic concept.
Hurt durrr. And you realize that drowning an individual situation in a SEA of individual situations makes it much easier to gloss over the inconsistencies in one of the multitude, right?