Individual situations are much harder to manipulate than large scale situations that can be hidden behind a multitude of faces and opinions. I mean sure maybe it was highly manipulated to the point that the questions it brought about were meant to spur on outcomes I haven't anticipated.(always division based of course though) or maybe it wasn't, and the msm focused so heavily on it as a random piece of "actual" news (that'd be rich)
Sure I could piece together a long theory on why it "seemed" not to go how it was intended, but actually did. But as it stands I'm holding out anything firm until I see what sorta piles the dust settles into.
Let's bring up vaccines as an example. From both sides. One side says "but hey this person and this person died!" The other says "but this person and this person had no problems!" People can transfer the focus across entire populations. That's a lot different than "hey the FBI withheld hi def drone footage" vs "yea but he shot two black people".
There's a lot more room for scrutiny on an individual basis, and a lot more room for shifting the conversation elsewhere on a group basis.
Hurt durrr. And you realize that drowning an individual situation in a SEA of individual situations makes it much easier to gloss over the inconsistencies in one of the multitude, right?
Individual situations are much harder to manipulate than large scale situations that can be hidden behind a multitude of faces and opinions. I mean sure maybe it was highly manipulated to the point that the questions it brought about were meant to spur on outcomes I haven't anticipated.(always division based of course though) or maybe it wasn't, and the msm focused so heavily on it as a random piece of "actual" news (that'd be rich)
Sure I could piece together a long theory on why it "seemed" not to go how it was intended, but actually did. But as it stands I'm holding out anything firm until I see what sorta piles the dust settles into.
You understand that large scale situations are made up of multiple individiual situations, right?
Let's bring up vaccines as an example. From both sides. One side says "but hey this person and this person died!" The other says "but this person and this person had no problems!" People can transfer the focus across entire populations. That's a lot different than "hey the FBI withheld hi def drone footage" vs "yea but he shot two black people".
There's a lot more room for scrutiny on an individual basis, and a lot more room for shifting the conversation elsewhere on a group basis.
I feel like this is a pretty basic concept.
Hurt durrr. And you realize that drowning an individual situation in a SEA of individual situations makes it much easier to gloss over the inconsistencies in one of the multitude, right?