Do you think that you will be allowed to access any real docs of Maxwell trial if they will include something really important, like names, locations and other specific, concrete things?
Any result of Maxwell trial is not intended for public disclosure from the beginning. In the best case any sensitive info will be secretly used by authorities to blackmail elite members if they will not follow narrative, and that's all.
Some time ago, EU MEPs demanded full disclosure of vaccine manufacturers agreement with EU. Finally they got only a heap of papers where nearly everything was blacked out.
What make you think that the result of Maxwell trial you will be allowed to see will be something different? And you are not even MEP.
JFK assasination docs still confidential. Why do you think Maxwell trial docs will be fully released?
There is absolutely nothing to distract from in Maxwell trial. You will not be allowed to see anything you don't need to see.
Ones who really want to do something about Maxwell trial have to somehow infiltrate into court, stole original classified papers and immidiately disclose them. This kind of activity in no case could be prevented by some nationwide discussed events.
You need to distract public in situation when public attention to some activity could really interfere with results of that activity. IDK, like passing some bill where puclic could act by pressuring senators, something that could initiate mass lawsuits or something that could lead to nationwide disobedience. Maxwell trial is not that kind of activity. There is nothing in Maxwell case public could somehow interfere.
There's so many things they're distracting from. Yes the Maxwell trial, but they have to keep the news on a racial narrative to follow the news of the Rittenhouse trial, which itself was most likely meant to go a different way and be politically utilized. OSHA mandates falling through, cases rising among vaxxed, gotta keep the covidians occupied.
They have a new narrative to bring about now that covid is turning, and they need time to solidify it. Be it climate change, small pox, whatever.
I can't understand how people can think the DS are powerful enough to pull off pandemics and presidential elections, but things like this just whoops...
Individual situations are much harder to manipulate than large scale situations that can be hidden behind a multitude of faces and opinions. I mean sure maybe it was highly manipulated to the point that the questions it brought about were meant to spur on outcomes I haven't anticipated.(always division based of course though) or maybe it wasn't, and the msm focused so heavily on it as a random piece of "actual" news (that'd be rich)
Sure I could piece together a long theory on why it "seemed" not to go how it was intended, but actually did. But as it stands I'm holding out anything firm until I see what sorta piles the dust settles into.
Let's bring up vaccines as an example. From both sides. One side says "but hey this person and this person died!" The other says "but this person and this person had no problems!" People can transfer the focus across entire populations. That's a lot different than "hey the FBI withheld hi def drone footage" vs "yea but he shot two black people".
There's a lot more room for scrutiny on an individual basis, and a lot more room for shifting the conversation elsewhere on a group basis.
Hurt durrr. And you realize that drowning an individual situation in a SEA of individual situations makes it much easier to gloss over the inconsistencies in one of the multitude, right?
At this point sure. People sitting at home "paying attention" that want to contribute usually do so with donations. They feel justified in saying "we are fighting" when really people are just getting fat and living large off of their money. Like what Bannon did with the Trump donations.
Distraction from what?
Do you think that you will be allowed to access any real docs of Maxwell trial if they will include something really important, like names, locations and other specific, concrete things?
Any result of Maxwell trial is not intended for public disclosure from the beginning. In the best case any sensitive info will be secretly used by authorities to blackmail elite members if they will not follow narrative, and that's all.
Some time ago, EU MEPs demanded full disclosure of vaccine manufacturers agreement with EU. Finally they got only a heap of papers where nearly everything was blacked out.
What make you think that the result of Maxwell trial you will be allowed to see will be something different? And you are not even MEP.
JFK assasination docs still confidential. Why do you think Maxwell trial docs will be fully released?
There is absolutely nothing to distract from in Maxwell trial. You will not be allowed to see anything you don't need to see.
Ones who really want to do something about Maxwell trial have to somehow infiltrate into court, stole original classified papers and immidiately disclose them. This kind of activity in no case could be prevented by some nationwide discussed events.
You need to distract public in situation when public attention to some activity could really interfere with results of that activity. IDK, like passing some bill where puclic could act by pressuring senators, something that could initiate mass lawsuits or something that could lead to nationwide disobedience. Maxwell trial is not that kind of activity. There is nothing in Maxwell case public could somehow interfere.
I'm never surprised when blacks commit heinous crimes or when jews lie.
There's so many things they're distracting from. Yes the Maxwell trial, but they have to keep the news on a racial narrative to follow the news of the Rittenhouse trial, which itself was most likely meant to go a different way and be politically utilized. OSHA mandates falling through, cases rising among vaxxed, gotta keep the covidians occupied. They have a new narrative to bring about now that covid is turning, and they need time to solidify it. Be it climate change, small pox, whatever.
I can't understand how people can think the DS are powerful enough to pull off pandemics and presidential elections, but things like this just whoops...
Individual situations are much harder to manipulate than large scale situations that can be hidden behind a multitude of faces and opinions. I mean sure maybe it was highly manipulated to the point that the questions it brought about were meant to spur on outcomes I haven't anticipated.(always division based of course though) or maybe it wasn't, and the msm focused so heavily on it as a random piece of "actual" news (that'd be rich)
Sure I could piece together a long theory on why it "seemed" not to go how it was intended, but actually did. But as it stands I'm holding out anything firm until I see what sorta piles the dust settles into.
You understand that large scale situations are made up of multiple individiual situations, right?
Let's bring up vaccines as an example. From both sides. One side says "but hey this person and this person died!" The other says "but this person and this person had no problems!" People can transfer the focus across entire populations. That's a lot different than "hey the FBI withheld hi def drone footage" vs "yea but he shot two black people".
There's a lot more room for scrutiny on an individual basis, and a lot more room for shifting the conversation elsewhere on a group basis.
I feel like this is a pretty basic concept.
Hurt durrr. And you realize that drowning an individual situation in a SEA of individual situations makes it much easier to gloss over the inconsistencies in one of the multitude, right?
Yeah I said the same thing and was downvoted into oblivion. Sure is awfully suspicious.
https://conspiracies.win/p/140JAiBqZ5/retards-are-obsessing-over-a-car/
Yeah, you dont mind saying what you think. I respect that. But to tell you the truth, I don't believe in trials anymore.
Do you think that maybe this is another hook? For the trump guppies to tag along, for like, a year or more?
At this point sure. People sitting at home "paying attention" that want to contribute usually do so with donations. They feel justified in saying "we are fighting" when really people are just getting fat and living large off of their money. Like what Bannon did with the Trump donations.
You didn't say the same thing and how you said it was just awful.
I think we're splitting hairs tbh