Okay. For economic reasons or even environmental reasons, you have decided to move us away from oil and gas.
....did you bother to replace it first? Or are we just going back to the stone age for fun?
You want the American people to be less dependent on gas, which is favorable to the American since its expensive and usually not domestic. Americans can and would get behind it. IF you are giving them a way to keep up, keep their jobs, continue having a way to get to work, continue keeping the lights on ALL the time, not sometimes.
WE have more oil than the rest of the world. More coal. More Uranium. The best drillers and technology, we were an energy exporter under Trump. Fossil fuels are the best, cheapest, & most reliable ways to energize the country (well actually nuclear is, but it would take decades to build all the nuclear plants we need.) This is ALL political. There is no reason to shut down pipelines.
The irony is, we would have a mostly nuclear power grid had it not been for the environmentalist hippies protesting it. If it weren't for "environmentalists" we wouldn't even be in this situation.
I am aware of that argument. Since I'm not a political scientist, I see no problem with both things being true. As you can see by my writing style in this forum, I am a believer in using more than one adjective. I do not call the United States a Democracy (noun); it is a Republic. I do refer to it the way I was taught, which is Democratic Republic, Democratic being an adjective. So when the anti-Democracy shills call you out on using the term by pointing out that it's Constitutional Republic, you, as a non-political scientist, can reply that it is a Democratic Constitutional Republic.
Okay. For economic reasons or even environmental reasons, you have decided to move us away from oil and gas.
....did you bother to replace it first? Or are we just going back to the stone age for fun?
You want the American people to be less dependent on gas, which is favorable to the American since its expensive and usually not domestic. Americans can and would get behind it. IF you are giving them a way to keep up, keep their jobs, continue having a way to get to work, continue keeping the lights on ALL the time, not sometimes.
WE have more oil than the rest of the world. More coal. More Uranium. The best drillers and technology, we were an energy exporter under Trump. Fossil fuels are the best, cheapest, & most reliable ways to energize the country (well actually nuclear is, but it would take decades to build all the nuclear plants we need.) This is ALL political. There is no reason to shut down pipelines.
Let's Go Brandon!
The irony is, we would have a mostly nuclear power grid had it not been for the environmentalist hippies protesting it. If it weren't for "environmentalists" we wouldn't even be in this situation.
Any links to this video?
And yeah, Democratic Republics are pretty good.
The United States isn't a Democratic Republic. Which is a major indicator you're a leftist.
As soon as the Republic
gets a constitution protecting us from your Democrat urges,
it's no longer a Democracy. It's a Constitutional Republic not a Democratic one.
No matter how many of your fellow leftists told you otherwise.
I am aware of that argument. Since I'm not a political scientist, I see no problem with both things being true. As you can see by my writing style in this forum, I am a believer in using more than one adjective. I do not call the United States a Democracy (noun); it is a Republic. I do refer to it the way I was taught, which is Democratic Republic, Democratic being an adjective. So when the anti-Democracy shills call you out on using the term by pointing out that it's Constitutional Republic, you, as a non-political scientist, can reply that it is a Democratic Constitutional Republic.
‘America Is a Republic, Not a Democracy’ Is a Dangerous—And Wrong—Argument https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/11/yes-constitution-democracy/616949/
Thanks 💙
Thank you!