I am aware of that argument. Since I'm not a political scientist, I see no problem with both things being true. As you can see by my writing style in this forum, I am a believer in using more than one adjective. I do not call the United States a Democracy (noun); it is a Republic. I do refer to it the way I was taught, which is Democratic Republic, Democratic being an adjective. So when the anti-Democracy shills call you out on using the term by pointing out that it's Constitutional Republic, you, as a non-political scientist, can reply that it is a Democratic Constitutional Republic.
I am aware of that argument. Since I'm not a political scientist, I see no problem with both things being true. As you can see by my writing style in this forum, I am a believer in using more than one adjective. I do not call the United States a Democracy (noun); it is a Republic. I do refer to it the way I was taught, which is Democratic Republic, Democratic being an adjective. So when the anti-Democracy shills call you out on using the term by pointing out that it's Constitutional Republic, you, as a non-political scientist, can reply that it is a Democratic Constitutional Republic.
‘America Is a Republic, Not a Democracy’ Is a Dangerous—And Wrong—Argument https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/11/yes-constitution-democracy/616949/