Some months back, someone asked the board what was the most outlandish theory that they researched, and/or came to believe; answers varied, but included things like simulation theory and multiverse theories such. I enjoyed reading that thread.
I want to ask the reverse. Where you do think that the "official narrative" or "conventional wisdom" is correct?
I'll go first.
-
Jet fuel may burn hot not melt steel beams, but the fires did weaken them enough to lose their structural integrity.
-
Space is not fake and gay.
The virus is potentially more deadly than the current stats show. This paper suggests the spike protein impairs DNA damage repair: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8538446/
That means people will get cancers.
That paper applies to the virus and probably the jabs also. The Spiked-based jabs, especially the mRNA ones, are a crime against humanity. Here's a great video about why the vaccines are so dangerous: https://www.bitchute.com/video/VA2Fv9cwSP7K/
There were or they were working on building WMDs in Iraq. Other despot regimes such as Iran and NK clearly are. They provide leverage. They had centrifuges. And if not nuclear we know they had a history of developing and using chemical. The severity and timing were likely exaggerated for political convenience.
I think this, to an extent, and in the long, long lead up to the war, the materials got moved to Syria. Still a dumb war though.
We’re still getting involved in other people’s sandboxes. I’m not defending the decision to go to war just the intelligence.
It's possible that Epstein killed himself, under coercion.
Sort of like that scene in the Godfather II where Frank Pentangelli and Tom discuss old Roman guards who committed suicide after failed coup attempts.
Ep signed a will the day before, and of course his steroid freak cellmate would be the threat.
(He could also be back on some island.)
I could see that. The only thing that throws it off for me, is the broken hyoid bone in the neck. He couldn't have done that they way they said he hanged himself.
I'm not sure where anybody stands on conspiracies.win about #4
As for number 3, I'm with you, in that I think that Jew deaths are exaggerated, but the other groups (POWs, Roma, disabled, political dissidents, etc) numbers are likely higher than Jew deaths, but we hardly ever hear about it.
Firstly, you are making the mistake of generalizing everyone here as being "this board" right out of the gate. You then go on to have other probems.
Even concerning the two things you claim:
You then need to demonstrate how weakened beams amount to collapsing like a controlled demolition.
Nobody believes that space is fake.
Meh. I've been on "this board" enough to generalize. Shit, the banner at the top says pretty much all there is to say.
Of course you do. "Weakened beams" would in no way make three buildings pancake.
The people who post that are fake and gay.
Anyway, you're set in your mind so no matter what is presented you'll not be swayed. I've been down this road before. The real conspiracy in 9/11 is Saudi involvement and that Bush likely let it happen.
That is not true at all. I just don't believe weakened steel would cause collapses like that to happen every time. I think they took down the buildings as part of a secret disaster protocol. If you can show me evidence that fire can reliably demolish steel frame skyscrapers, I'll look at it.
This is exactly what I believe, but with even more to it. People knew in advance and used it as an opportunity.
The fire doesn't have to "demolish" the steel frames. The fire only has to weaken them such that they don't work as a vertical support for the amount of weight they were holding up. Layers above where the fire was taking place were putting the weight on them in their weakened state. Eventually they gave.
I get the hypothesis. I just don't think they would all have that characteristic, controlled-demolition collapse due to random weakening of the frame.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) each one is within constant movement aka SPACE, noun [Latin spatium, space; spatior, to wander.]