When you say "I"; you confirm to respond by choice in the name of the corporate identity of the name given to you or the avatars you chose to represent you. The beast system aims at the corporate identities; while destroying all those who consent to attach themselves to them; instead of living under natural law as a choice based response to balance.
Nature does not brand any information; it moves all within; which our senses perceive as inspiration for our choice to respond to for self sustenance. All information is suggested to us by others, who use words to suggest idolized meaning; which when consented to deceives one to ignore the source of all meaning (movement).
Common Law represents the rules for the slaves; Maritime Admiralty Law the operating system for the slavers underneath Common Law, and Natural Law represents the rules defined by this reality for all within. Ignorance of the latter causes exploitation through the former.
The former represents suggested rules by those within nature to each other; while the latter represents the rules that can only be comprehend by ones choices upon all perceived. From nature we receive inspiration (for ones choice of need); while others tempt us with suggested information (for ones choice of want). Want represents the ignorance of need and the parasitic few represent the response to the ignorance of the many.
Try to allow yourself to question the following...nature represents the source of sound; those within nature perceive sound; chose to shape it into words; then suggest words as meaning for perceived sound to each other.
If nature communicates itself to us through sound; what does suggesting shaped sound (words) imply for understanding perceived sound?
I am not nearly high enough for this, nor do I think I ever could be.
Growth of comprehension requires choice based adaptation to inspiration; while resisting the temptation of suggested information.
How about this one? Does a "cow" exist before we branded it "cow"? If yes; does everything existed before we branded it with suggested words? If nature doesn't brand itself; why do we do it?
Have fun with your ayh (pronounced ay?) thing, though.
I stick to natural law. Playing around within the suggested laws of men isn't my cup of tea.
So your virtual avatar can be cooler than you, and you can feel good because these shoes arent made by slave children!
One thing for sure. You were correct about money laundering with this NFT craze. Million of dollars for a jpeg. Sure
Consoom imaginary sneakers, and then get excited for new imaginary sneakers!
What is this ayh thing?
When you say "I"; you confirm to respond by choice in the name of the corporate identity of the name given to you or the avatars you chose to represent you. The beast system aims at the corporate identities; while destroying all those who consent to attach themselves to them; instead of living under natural law as a choice based response to balance.
Nature does not brand any information; it moves all within; which our senses perceive as inspiration for our choice to respond to for self sustenance. All information is suggested to us by others, who use words to suggest idolized meaning; which when consented to deceives one to ignore the source of all meaning (movement).
Is this part part of Common Law?
Common Law represents the rules for the slaves; Maritime Admiralty Law the operating system for the slavers underneath Common Law, and Natural Law represents the rules defined by this reality for all within. Ignorance of the latter causes exploitation through the former.
The former represents suggested rules by those within nature to each other; while the latter represents the rules that can only be comprehend by ones choices upon all perceived. From nature we receive inspiration (for ones choice of need); while others tempt us with suggested information (for ones choice of want). Want represents the ignorance of need and the parasitic few represent the response to the ignorance of the many.
Oooooooo-kay.
Try to allow yourself to question the following...nature represents the source of sound; those within nature perceive sound; chose to shape it into words; then suggest words as meaning for perceived sound to each other.
If nature communicates itself to us through sound; what does suggesting shaped sound (words) imply for understanding perceived sound?
I am not nearly high enough for this, nor do I think I ever could be.
Have fun with your ayh (pronounced ay?) thing, though.
Growth of comprehension requires choice based adaptation to inspiration; while resisting the temptation of suggested information.
How about this one? Does a "cow" exist before we branded it "cow"? If yes; does everything existed before we branded it with suggested words? If nature doesn't brand itself; why do we do it?
I stick to natural law. Playing around within the suggested laws of men isn't my cup of tea.
Because he thinks it will protect him from prosecution somehow.
I still don't understand.
Neither do I really, but apparently if they don't say "I" then the guys who arkancide dissidents won't have a reason to bury them out in the desert.
I know what you're saying, and I agree.