Next to the moon landing, covid makes us all look like geniuses.
But after the success of the stories about the "gas chambers" and the "ovens" and the "six million" they knew for sure that they could say anything at all and it wouldn't matter.
That's exactly right. Going to the moon was really expensive and those missions used the Saturn V rocket - the biggest rocket ever launched by the US - which they stopped making in the 1970s. The space shuttle was not capable of reaching the moon - it was billed as a cheap, reusable system for low earth orbit and it ended up being super expensive and time consuming to refurbish (not to mention dangerous). This decision caused NASA to no longer have a moon-capable rocket for humans.
Since the shuttle program ended they've been working on their next moon-capable rocket, the Artemis rocket, but it is years overdue and overbudget and is already outdated compared to the Starship being tested by SpaceX.
Kennedy set a goal for going to the moon in 1961-- allegedly the goal was achieved 8 years later. 60 years later and going back is now a 10+ year project (I'm betting more like never). What other industrial/ technological endeavor has ever been harder to repeat with the benefit of more technology?
It's going to take us longer to re-invent the big fucking rocket from 60 years ago than it did to invent it in the first place? Why should anyone accept this?
I'm sure other people can explain it better than I can, but building a rocket that can take humans to the moon (or mars) is really expensive and requires a lot of trial and error to get it right. The government is incredibly inefficient and NASA has become more motivated to ensure safety (and avoid bad PR) rather than getting results. What they accomplished in the 60's was done by a completely different organization than today's NASA (just look at how the rest of gov't has changed).
It is going to take longer this time than it did in the 60's because of the politics. Every time a new president is elected, he has changed NASA's objectives for the next 4 - 8 years, making it hard to get to the finish line of a big project.
That's why my real interest is in what SpaceX is doing. They're much faster at prototyping and testing. They've launched (and blown up) quite a few Starships already and are far ahead of any other space org.
https://imgur.com/NEjPm6t
Did Bezos have the capsule wiped clean before the camera people started filming the capsule up close? Did they also dry it off after cleaning it?
No
Astronauts
Should
Apply
Astro naught.
NASA are nothing but scammers, even Trappist 1 is not a new discovery, but comes once every millennium. With the Pioneer Plaque they are making fun of humanity and calling them dumb. They secretly tell you the truth, but the moon landing is not one of them.
The masses like the world fantasy and bullshit more than the truth. Space X is most likely to defend Earth from meteorites due to Trappist 1 which would have most likely left many laying around in space.
Trappist 1 also took Pluto away, they pretend it's still there but delisted it as a planet, knowing eventually humanity will forget about it. Once again, more lies, Pluto is gone for the next 1,000 years until Trappist 1 returns.
Trappist 1 is another solar system that NASA tried to pass of as a new discovery in 2017. Just another big lie by them to take advantage of the ignorant. I was just trying to point out that all they do is scam people.
Guy… you REALLY believe that? Like take a step back and meditate on it… in a world where every other technology advances forward, that’s the One that regresses ?
It hasn't regressed, they've made advances in rocket technology. The problem is that a rocket is a very complex system that has to get every variable correct or else something very bad happens to the rocket. It's not like they can just rebuild old designs from the 1960s... the fabrication techniques they used then don't exist anymore.
So are you saying that something built in the 1960s, without the aid of design and simulation software we have now, without the current advancement of material fabrication and chemical synthesis is not possible now?
If they done it in 8 years back then, they can at least do it again from scratch in say 5 years? They do not have to reuse any old blueprints! Everything is so much easier and quicker to build nowadays.
The only reason you won't accept it is cognitive dissonance.
I think we are in agreement. They could do it if they redesigned the rocket using modern engineering techniques. I don't think they could take an old design and build it today, though. Especially not quickly or cheaply.
As for how long it would take to redesign and build an old rocket, I have no idea. NASA doesn't seem motivated to do anything quickly these days. I think they opted for a new design (SLS/Artemis) with more flexibility for advanced missions, not just to the moon, but to Mars as well.
I know it for a fact I cant really say why. But in the coming years you will remember this post when it comes out in the mainstream. But there are 100 percent bases on the moon, thats the reason there are no more moon missions. It has to be kept hidden
I was a little late to the party, but listening to Joe Rogan debate the moon landing with a professional moon landing apologist was what woke me up. Now I'm a militant moon landing skeptic. I implore you to watch this if you haven't seen it already: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDLFm-DRPQg&list=PLA3ED2E5D5A8D72CD
Like the guy in OP's post implies, the absolute stupidest cope I see these days is "buh buh da soviets woulda called us out!" They tried, dumbass. The USSR was notorious for saying anything to its citizens to make the government look good. Why would the space race be the ONE thing commies grew a conscience about and told the "truth"? Even if we did land on the moon, the soviets would never admit it and there was no incentive to. You just weren't privy to what the USSR government was saying 50 years ago because you live in the American propagandasphere and most shitty Soviet propaganda was lost to time after the Soviet Union's collapse. Fortunately, there are now calls to re-investigate the moon landing coming from, you guessed it, Russia: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/06/17/russian-official-wants-to-investigate-whether-u-s-moon-landings-actually-happened/
...the only meaningful proof would be the telemetry data... which mysteriously vanished decades ago. Ngl, it's super-fun redpilling people on this particular subject. It's so easy to convince people if they just listen to me for 45 minutes.
This is my firmly held belief too. And the one version of 'Why we moon no more?" that no one wants to discuss. Maybe because if this is true it means we're all prisoners on this rock with no means of parole and all the uncomfortable implications that come with it.
Ya watching the press conference with the astronauts after their mission. They look absolutely disturbed. This could explain why some fake footage was shown to the public. I believe our government will never have an honest disclosure. What information they do let slide will be heavily altered to fit their agenda.
There was a military counterpart to the SS, it had all the features of the SS with the addition of having jet engines for landing. NASA is just a civilian agency pony show. There's obviously better tech that has been kept classified under military control.
The way I’ve seen it explained is that the ww2 scientists and pilots sort of phased out. Maybe it was more a loss of willpower following the decline of the Cold War. Maybe it is as you suggest a cover.
They need to go back to the 16kb computer they had and a manual land line phone connection to the moon.
The moon landing is funny af.
Next to the moon landing, covid makes us all look like geniuses.
But after the success of the stories about the "gas chambers" and the "ovens" and the "six million" they knew for sure that they could say anything at all and it wouldn't matter.
Because the goyim really are that dumb.
ayy Tone, wooden doors
why did deys have a swim team if deys wuz gonna whack'em?
Forming a death camp swim team and hiring a bad coach means all the swim team members drown.
Think about all the money you just saved by avoiding the purchase of poison gas.
It’s the biggest red flag that blows my mind.
“We lost the ability”
That’s just not how technological advancements work. You don’t lose the ability to do something. You choose not to do it.
That's exactly right. Going to the moon was really expensive and those missions used the Saturn V rocket - the biggest rocket ever launched by the US - which they stopped making in the 1970s. The space shuttle was not capable of reaching the moon - it was billed as a cheap, reusable system for low earth orbit and it ended up being super expensive and time consuming to refurbish (not to mention dangerous). This decision caused NASA to no longer have a moon-capable rocket for humans.
Since the shuttle program ended they've been working on their next moon-capable rocket, the Artemis rocket, but it is years overdue and overbudget and is already outdated compared to the Starship being tested by SpaceX.
Kennedy set a goal for going to the moon in 1961-- allegedly the goal was achieved 8 years later. 60 years later and going back is now a 10+ year project (I'm betting more like never). What other industrial/ technological endeavor has ever been harder to repeat with the benefit of more technology?
It's going to take us longer to re-invent the big fucking rocket from 60 years ago than it did to invent it in the first place? Why should anyone accept this?
I'm sure other people can explain it better than I can, but building a rocket that can take humans to the moon (or mars) is really expensive and requires a lot of trial and error to get it right. The government is incredibly inefficient and NASA has become more motivated to ensure safety (and avoid bad PR) rather than getting results. What they accomplished in the 60's was done by a completely different organization than today's NASA (just look at how the rest of gov't has changed).
It is going to take longer this time than it did in the 60's because of the politics. Every time a new president is elected, he has changed NASA's objectives for the next 4 - 8 years, making it hard to get to the finish line of a big project.
That's why my real interest is in what SpaceX is doing. They're much faster at prototyping and testing. They've launched (and blown up) quite a few Starships already and are far ahead of any other space org.
https://imgur.com/NEjPm6t Did Bezos have the capsule wiped clean before the camera people started filming the capsule up close? Did they also dry it off after cleaning it?
No Astronauts Should Apply
Astro naught.
NASA are nothing but scammers, even Trappist 1 is not a new discovery, but comes once every millennium. With the Pioneer Plaque they are making fun of humanity and calling them dumb. They secretly tell you the truth, but the moon landing is not one of them.
The masses like the world fantasy and bullshit more than the truth. Space X is most likely to defend Earth from meteorites due to Trappist 1 which would have most likely left many laying around in space.
Trappist 1 also took Pluto away, they pretend it's still there but delisted it as a planet, knowing eventually humanity will forget about it. Once again, more lies, Pluto is gone for the next 1,000 years until Trappist 1 returns.
I like the bit about blue origin... that capsule is suspiciously clean!
I've never heard of Trappist 1, so I'm not sure what dots you're connecting there...
Trappist 1 is another solar system that NASA tried to pass of as a new discovery in 2017. Just another big lie by them to take advantage of the ignorant. I was just trying to point out that all they do is scam people.
Guy… you REALLY believe that? Like take a step back and meditate on it… in a world where every other technology advances forward, that’s the One that regresses ?
It hasn't regressed, they've made advances in rocket technology. The problem is that a rocket is a very complex system that has to get every variable correct or else something very bad happens to the rocket. It's not like they can just rebuild old designs from the 1960s... the fabrication techniques they used then don't exist anymore.
So are you saying that something built in the 1960s, without the aid of design and simulation software we have now, without the current advancement of material fabrication and chemical synthesis is not possible now?
If they done it in 8 years back then, they can at least do it again from scratch in say 5 years? They do not have to reuse any old blueprints! Everything is so much easier and quicker to build nowadays.
The only reason you won't accept it is cognitive dissonance.
I think we are in agreement. They could do it if they redesigned the rocket using modern engineering techniques. I don't think they could take an old design and build it today, though. Especially not quickly or cheaply.
As for how long it would take to redesign and build an old rocket, I have no idea. NASA doesn't seem motivated to do anything quickly these days. I think they opted for a new design (SLS/Artemis) with more flexibility for advanced missions, not just to the moon, but to Mars as well.
You can’t build rockets to the moon if all your Nazi rocket scientists are dead.
Oh, did you think all those NASA rockets were designed by American scientists, ha ha ha.
We didnt lose the ability. They are covering up the fact that there are full blown bases built on the moon. Laugh all you want, I guarantee it
What makes you think that?
I know it for a fact I cant really say why. But in the coming years you will remember this post when it comes out in the mainstream. But there are 100 percent bases on the moon, thats the reason there are no more moon missions. It has to be kept hidden
What are we doing up there? Spaceport? Mining? Surveillance?
5 years ago I'd say you're crazy.
Now I'd say there's a 50/50 shot you're right, and I wouldn't be surprised.
I have heard they want to repeat Vasco da Gama's 1497 journey from Portugal to India via the Cape of Good Hope.
But they have lost the technologies.
Still, they're continuing to work on it.
I was a little late to the party, but listening to Joe Rogan debate the moon landing with a professional moon landing apologist was what woke me up. Now I'm a militant moon landing skeptic. I implore you to watch this if you haven't seen it already: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDLFm-DRPQg&list=PLA3ED2E5D5A8D72CD
Like the guy in OP's post implies, the absolute stupidest cope I see these days is "buh buh da soviets woulda called us out!" They tried, dumbass. The USSR was notorious for saying anything to its citizens to make the government look good. Why would the space race be the ONE thing commies grew a conscience about and told the "truth"? Even if we did land on the moon, the soviets would never admit it and there was no incentive to. You just weren't privy to what the USSR government was saying 50 years ago because you live in the American propagandasphere and most shitty Soviet propaganda was lost to time after the Soviet Union's collapse. Fortunately, there are now calls to re-investigate the moon landing coming from, you guessed it, Russia: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/06/17/russian-official-wants-to-investigate-whether-u-s-moon-landings-actually-happened/
Because:
...the only meaningful proof would be the telemetry data... which mysteriously vanished decades ago. Ngl, it's super-fun redpilling people on this particular subject. It's so easy to convince people if they just listen to me for 45 minutes.
Or there is something on the moon, that is stopping us from going back.
This is my firmly held belief too. And the one version of 'Why we moon no more?" that no one wants to discuss. Maybe because if this is true it means we're all prisoners on this rock with no means of parole and all the uncomfortable implications that come with it.
Ya watching the press conference with the astronauts after their mission. They look absolutely disturbed. This could explain why some fake footage was shown to the public. I believe our government will never have an honest disclosure. What information they do let slide will be heavily altered to fit their agenda.
Lost footage rediscovered.
https://yts.rs/movie/a-trip-to-the-moon-1902
There was a military counterpart to the SS, it had all the features of the SS with the addition of having jet engines for landing. NASA is just a civilian agency pony show. There's obviously better tech that has been kept classified under military control.
Space stations are in low earth orbit. No big radiation problems there.
"American Moon"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/bOyJqF7PE5cF/
The way I’ve seen it explained is that the ww2 scientists and pilots sort of phased out. Maybe it was more a loss of willpower following the decline of the Cold War. Maybe it is as you suggest a cover.
They lost the Casio digital watch that it was all run off.