Have you seen the videos of trump at his speech before it all started? People on telegram were posting it and asking, “what’s in the yellow folder?” He was holding a yellow folder that looked like it was an intelligence related.. and after he told the crowd to head to the capitol with him, he was quickly pulled away from the scene.. it’s heard to tell what they were playing at for sure, “DS narrative” vs “counter narrative”? Or was he in on it. Either way, the day did not play out as badly for patriots as they wanted. They wanted more destruction and deaths.. as it is, when the media says, “Jan 6 protesters are terrorist and need to be locked up!” People at least start scratching their heads and say, “really? Are they? Do they?”….
Yup. It’s been my opinion that most presidents are shown who is in control before they actually do anything. The black eye club. They probably have to stand there and be given a black eye in a humiliating fashion.. and they know nothing will be done about it, because so many people have cognitive dissonance to the truth. It they tried to name names, most people would be unable to begin to believe it.
I do lean towards your idea, that they let trump “play president” and then showed him at the end. Lindel, Sydney, and Patrick burns said they were not able to see him in January.. before that, they seemed to be in communication. When ties were cut, trump was only taking the advice of “his legal” advisors(who happened to be “jews”….)
As for “now what”. We are in a patience game and information war. An over reaction too early from our side of truth will not help. I don’t know when too early is though.. as for information- The enemy has started to over disseminate false info via “alternative medians”. I’m about to make a post on this topic actually. Have you noticed all of the “new” people in the last year who have popped up with all the same good anti mRNA shot info? A lot of them are starting to throw different rabbit trails out.. some may be bad actors and others are just being fed false info.. either way, we are starting to see a divide and conquer strategy..
Just saw part 1, and it is a must-watch. You will learn how political movements are infiltrated and marginalized from a person whose job it was to do just that.
And you would be naive to think they aren't using organized tactics to do the same thing to online political speech as well. It's at the point where they are openly suggesting we commit crimes.
This is just to make you angry and go to revolt. They want this... That's why Trump is now playing the role of the underdog... Tucker was always one to incite anger while he is comfortable in his studio. I don't know... You are probably taking this "documentary" in the emotional way, I just think it in the rational one. When your anger passes you will see it for what it really is.
The question is was trump in on it?
Good question.
Think big, who controls ((them)) that’s what we need to focus on
Have you seen the videos of trump at his speech before it all started? People on telegram were posting it and asking, “what’s in the yellow folder?” He was holding a yellow folder that looked like it was an intelligence related.. and after he told the crowd to head to the capitol with him, he was quickly pulled away from the scene.. it’s heard to tell what they were playing at for sure, “DS narrative” vs “counter narrative”? Or was he in on it. Either way, the day did not play out as badly for patriots as they wanted. They wanted more destruction and deaths.. as it is, when the media says, “Jan 6 protesters are terrorist and need to be locked up!” People at least start scratching their heads and say, “really? Are they? Do they?”….
Find their bunkers?
Yup. It’s been my opinion that most presidents are shown who is in control before they actually do anything. The black eye club. They probably have to stand there and be given a black eye in a humiliating fashion.. and they know nothing will be done about it, because so many people have cognitive dissonance to the truth. It they tried to name names, most people would be unable to begin to believe it.
I do lean towards your idea, that they let trump “play president” and then showed him at the end. Lindel, Sydney, and Patrick burns said they were not able to see him in January.. before that, they seemed to be in communication. When ties were cut, trump was only taking the advice of “his legal” advisors(who happened to be “jews”….)
As for “now what”. We are in a patience game and information war. An over reaction too early from our side of truth will not help. I don’t know when too early is though.. as for information- The enemy has started to over disseminate false info via “alternative medians”. I’m about to make a post on this topic actually. Have you noticed all of the “new” people in the last year who have popped up with all the same good anti mRNA shot info? A lot of them are starting to throw different rabbit trails out.. some may be bad actors and others are just being fed false info.. either way, we are starting to see a divide and conquer strategy..
Of course he is.
That seems virtually impossible to me.
I don't care how you want people to vote.
you are perfectly retarded to believe it
Surrounded himself with Barr, Bolton, and Fauci.
Just saw part 1, and it is a must-watch. You will learn how political movements are infiltrated and marginalized from a person whose job it was to do just that.
And you would be naive to think they aren't using organized tactics to do the same thing to online political speech as well. It's at the point where they are openly suggesting we commit crimes.
ALL RIGHT! I'LL WATCH IT! YOU HAVE TO BE AFREN THOUGH AND YOU KNOW THAT'S THE TRUTH.
I love you :D
He still accepts the official 9/11 narrative, which set the stage for what he’s complaining about.
Totally not controlled OP...
These video links are now blocked due to copyright.
thx for the head's up, changed the links.
This is just to make you angry and go to revolt. They want this... That's why Trump is now playing the role of the underdog... Tucker was always one to incite anger while he is comfortable in his studio. I don't know... You are probably taking this "documentary" in the emotional way, I just think it in the rational one. When your anger passes you will see it for what it really is.
So you’re saying we shouldn’t watch it because the truth will make us angry
Obviously - NO. I am saying don't get angry because that's what they want. Watch whatever you want... you thought my comment could stop you?
Blocked video... Anyone have alternative link?
fixed!