What if perception (knowledge) represents the same for all; yet comprehension (understanding) is different for each one?
Also...does nature offer text to our perception; or does someone within nature used choice to shape text out of what nature offered? Did you use choice upon perceived or upon text suggested by others?
"suggested by others" cannot really be in this model. It is "perceived as suggested by others".
Some claim pink is not existing objectively. Really ? Which color exist objectively ?
Japanese were not recognising difference between green and blue [please not comment this example ok ?]
"suggested by others" cannot really be in this model. It is "perceived as suggested by others".
This is where one needs self discernment about ones position. You perceive as ONE from ALL aka as form (life) from flow (inception towards death) aka as within nature from what moves nature. Perception represents senses responding to movement. A schnoz requires moving smell to sense it...
Now ask yourself...if others within nature suggest you something; then where do they got it from? They perceived it from the same nature as you do; but their suggested explanation represents a parasite to the perceived. You perceive inspiration for your choice to respond to; others choose to shape out of perceived inspiration affixed information (words aka idolized meaning); which they then choose to suggest to you.
That's not perceived inspiration; but the temptation of suggested information.
Form a simpler perspective...nature offers choice what's needed; others suggest choice what isn't needed aka wants aka temptations aka choices.
Even simpler...nature offers order; others suggest orders.
Before you make a choice (want vs not want) upon anything suggested; you make a choice within balance (need/want) upon perceived.
Some claim pink is not existing objectively. Really ? Which color exist objectively ? Japanese were not recognizing difference between green and blue [please not comment this example ok ?]
What if as form within flow; we represent the subjective response of form to objective flow? Choice can only ever assume within balance; because balance (momentum) is defined as the response to being moved. Motion causes momentum aka velocity (flow) causes its own resistance (form).
What if pink; green and blue don't need to be branded for our choice to respond to them? What if all differentiation is needed for one to perceive inspiration to respond to for ones self sustenance?
If I lack comprehension about what others perceive (pink; green; blue); then what if the differences in comprehension is what I need to use as inspiration to grow my own comprehension? If we sit together and you start segregating the green from the blue gummi bears; then I perceive different behavior as inspiration. I don't need you to tell me why you did it; which would represent a temptation to ignore perceived inspiration for suggested information by you. What if I believe you and you start suggesting me that the gummi bears told you to segregate them; because there's a race-war brewing? See how my ignorance can tempt you to exploit me; which in the process tempts you to exploit others until we have the shlomo shit show of today?
The problem is while 3rd party information is indeed less valuable it is also faster way of learning than using only your own perception of nature from the beginning without middleman :( I maybe understand your point but it wouldn't work for me.
Such castle can be recognised as both stronghold and prison. Both definitions true.
As life being moved from inception towards death....what does wanting "faster" implies? Could it be that all suggested information tempts one towards death; which is why the few institutionalized the education system; the religions; the economies and any other means to mass suggest information to the many?
What if the conscious memory needs to be used like a ram for temporary storage of information; while allowing the constant adaptation to perceived inspiration; instead of like a hard-drive that is being filled until capacity with suggested information?
Could it be that the few suggest information to trick the many to fill up their memory; which in return restricts their growth potential; their comprehension and even their basic self sustenance?
middleman
ME'DIATE, adjective [Latin medius, middle.] as in the main stream media aka the middleman for the main stream (flow for form).
it wouldn't work for me
Why do you have choice within nature? Self sustenance. Why does every life have choice within nature. Self sustenance. What if flow/form represent the self sustenance of EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.]?
What if everything works for you and you work for everything? Or to use a parasite sleight of hand: "ALL for ONE and ONE for ALL".
Such castle can be recognized as both stronghold and prison. Both definitions true.
What comes first...wanted vs not wanted suggested definition of stronghold or prison or need of shelter? Could it be that flow defines the need for shelter for the form within?
Go outside and wait to find out if shelter becomes needed just by being moved from inception towards death?
What if perception (knowledge) represents the same for all; yet comprehension (understanding) is different for each one?
Also...does nature offer text to our perception; or does someone within nature used choice to shape text out of what nature offered? Did you use choice upon perceived or upon text suggested by others?
"suggested by others" cannot really be in this model. It is "perceived as suggested by others".
Some claim pink is not existing objectively. Really ? Which color exist objectively ? Japanese were not recognising difference between green and blue [please not comment this example ok ?]
This is where one needs self discernment about ones position. You perceive as ONE from ALL aka as form (life) from flow (inception towards death) aka as within nature from what moves nature. Perception represents senses responding to movement. A schnoz requires moving smell to sense it...
Now ask yourself...if others within nature suggest you something; then where do they got it from? They perceived it from the same nature as you do; but their suggested explanation represents a parasite to the perceived. You perceive inspiration for your choice to respond to; others choose to shape out of perceived inspiration affixed information (words aka idolized meaning); which they then choose to suggest to you.
That's not perceived inspiration; but the temptation of suggested information.
Form a simpler perspective...nature offers choice what's needed; others suggest choice what isn't needed aka wants aka temptations aka choices.
Even simpler...nature offers order; others suggest orders.
Before you make a choice (want vs not want) upon anything suggested; you make a choice within balance (need/want) upon perceived.
What if as form within flow; we represent the subjective response of form to objective flow? Choice can only ever assume within balance; because balance (momentum) is defined as the response to being moved. Motion causes momentum aka velocity (flow) causes its own resistance (form).
What if pink; green and blue don't need to be branded for our choice to respond to them? What if all differentiation is needed for one to perceive inspiration to respond to for ones self sustenance?
If I lack comprehension about what others perceive (pink; green; blue); then what if the differences in comprehension is what I need to use as inspiration to grow my own comprehension? If we sit together and you start segregating the green from the blue gummi bears; then I perceive different behavior as inspiration. I don't need you to tell me why you did it; which would represent a temptation to ignore perceived inspiration for suggested information by you. What if I believe you and you start suggesting me that the gummi bears told you to segregate them; because there's a race-war brewing? See how my ignorance can tempt you to exploit me; which in the process tempts you to exploit others until we have the shlomo shit show of today?
hahaha... Got it maybe. At least in part.
The problem is while 3rd party information is indeed less valuable it is also faster way of learning than using only your own perception of nature from the beginning without middleman :( I maybe understand your point but it wouldn't work for me.
Such castle can be recognised as both stronghold and prison. Both definitions true.
As life being moved from inception towards death....what does wanting "faster" implies? Could it be that all suggested information tempts one towards death; which is why the few institutionalized the education system; the religions; the economies and any other means to mass suggest information to the many?
What if the conscious memory needs to be used like a ram for temporary storage of information; while allowing the constant adaptation to perceived inspiration; instead of like a hard-drive that is being filled until capacity with suggested information?
Could it be that the few suggest information to trick the many to fill up their memory; which in return restricts their growth potential; their comprehension and even their basic self sustenance?
ME'DIATE, adjective [Latin medius, middle.] as in the main stream media aka the middleman for the main stream (flow for form).
Why do you have choice within nature? Self sustenance. Why does every life have choice within nature. Self sustenance. What if flow/form represent the self sustenance of EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.]?
What if everything works for you and you work for everything? Or to use a parasite sleight of hand: "ALL for ONE and ONE for ALL".
What comes first...wanted vs not wanted suggested definition of stronghold or prison or need of shelter? Could it be that flow defines the need for shelter for the form within?
Go outside and wait to find out if shelter becomes needed just by being moved from inception towards death?