It sucks watching a genocide, OUR genocide, happen in real time and NOT BE ABLE TO TELL PEOPLE!
Ignorance is what allows the few to stage the self destruction of the many as suggested genocides. Consent to suggested information (want vs not want) over adaptation to perceived inspiration (need) is what represents the exploited ignorance.
The issue within not being able to tell others (suggest information) is based on us ignoring that nature doesn't communicate itself by words; by brands; by idolized meaning suggested towards responding choice. Instead it moves us; which we perceive as inspiration for our choice to respond to. If one chooses to adapt to this (choice of need over want) then this causes resonance; while want over need (ignorance) causes dissonance.
Resonance as choice to balance represents communication; not agreeing vs disagreeing over the suggested meanings (words) by others. The former represents adaptation; the latter self imposed mental stagnation.
I remain optimistic for the long term
What if life isn't outcome oriented (since death is predefined at inception); but a response to balance instead?
I think that is true and right now we are out of balance so the long term positive outcome will be to regain balance.
a) true vs false implies consent to suggested information; while ignoring perceived inspiration. Nature doesn't offer false states; neither does it proclaim true states. That represents your choice of want over need; hence imbalance over balance.
b) choice represents response to balance (need/want) and can therefore not be "out of balance" only ignore (want over need) to resonate (need over want) with balance; which happens when consenting to suggested choices.
c) regaining balance requires gaining self discernment as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka choice within balance (momentum) of motion. Choice represents need of balancing; not finding balance as a wanted outcome. Nature represents the natural order offering balance to the responding choice; yet adherence and ignorance are the choices within balance.
pineal gland
As simple as the pine cone aka growth potential (comprehension) by seed (choice) out of soil (perception).
Third eye
Sense (seeing with eyes) implies perception of form within the momentum of flow aka moving inspiration. The third eye represents the comprehension of the flow; that causes the momentum; as the balance for the choice based response by the form within.
Example...the eyes perceive being alive; the third eye comprehends the inception and death that life is balancing in-between; which are out of range for perception.
Form cannot sense flow; comprehension of flow has to be grown; shaped; transmuted by choice based response to perceived inspiration.
Example...flow moves form from beginning towards end (one direction); yet form within has the free will of choice to move left/right; up/down; for/back; through/around); while being moved by flow in one direction. Dominance (balance) causes liberty; from liber "free" (choice); hence free-dom (balance of liberty/dominance).
Now that I have your attention
Just throw stuff at me. I adapt to what inspires anyway.
Shit free-will, either I’ve been reading too much of your posts or you’ve been interacting with too many of us near-normals.... Your prose seems a bit more refined and easier for even a normie to understand with minimal internal repeating and restructuring. Don’t take this as an insult or anything, I just don’t want you to lose your touch. Your style was weird but damnit it was unique, special and an interesting read.
Your prose seems a bit more refined and easier for even a normie to understand with minimal internal repeating and restructuring
What if you're describing the consequences of your own growth of understanding? If you read that much of me going over the same stuff over and over again; then it becomes harder to ignore getting inspired; and the more one adapts to perceived inspiration; the more one grows comprehended information.
Meanwhile I get more and more proficient in stripping languages of all the suggested rhetoric and inversion; which allows me to de-masquerade ignorance; which when responding to me has few tools left to hide behind.
you’ve been interacting with too many of us near-normals
Within ALL each ONE represents the balance of inspiration for self sustenance or temptation towards ignorance for choice of reaction. I can get the same inspiration out of milking goats; while watching an infant sleeping next to me. It's not what others represent; but what I choose to shape out of it.
Don’t take this as an insult or anything
It's continuous insults and praises that inspired me to teach/learn myself about placement of evaluation (choice) within value (balance). Just a couple response back someone told me I write a language that nobody understands; and you are with the opposite suggestion. Well; it turns out I'm balancing within value; while the suggested value by others represents a temptation for me to ignore my placement. I resist that. The suggested wants of individual others do not represent collective need.
I just don’t want you to lose your touch.
Want vs not want (reason); while ignoring need. What if input defines output? Also; Stan Bush told me that "It's in the blood, it's in the will" and that "You got the power; you got the motion; you got the touch".
Your style was weird but damnit it was unique, special and an interesting read.
A rhetorical obituary. No rest within movement tho...
Ignorance is what allows the few to stage the self destruction of the many as suggested genocides. Consent to suggested information (want vs not want) over adaptation to perceived inspiration (need) is what represents the exploited ignorance.
The issue within not being able to tell others (suggest information) is based on us ignoring that nature doesn't communicate itself by words; by brands; by idolized meaning suggested towards responding choice. Instead it moves us; which we perceive as inspiration for our choice to respond to. If one chooses to adapt to this (choice of need over want) then this causes resonance; while want over need (ignorance) causes dissonance.
Resonance as choice to balance represents communication; not agreeing vs disagreeing over the suggested meanings (words) by others. The former represents adaptation; the latter self imposed mental stagnation.
What if life isn't outcome oriented (since death is predefined at inception); but a response to balance instead?
a) true vs false implies consent to suggested information; while ignoring perceived inspiration. Nature doesn't offer false states; neither does it proclaim true states. That represents your choice of want over need; hence imbalance over balance.
b) choice represents response to balance (need/want) and can therefore not be "out of balance" only ignore (want over need) to resonate (need over want) with balance; which happens when consenting to suggested choices.
c) regaining balance requires gaining self discernment as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka choice within balance (momentum) of motion. Choice represents need of balancing; not finding balance as a wanted outcome. Nature represents the natural order offering balance to the responding choice; yet adherence and ignorance are the choices within balance.
As simple as the pine cone aka growth potential (comprehension) by seed (choice) out of soil (perception).
Sense (seeing with eyes) implies perception of form within the momentum of flow aka moving inspiration. The third eye represents the comprehension of the flow; that causes the momentum; as the balance for the choice based response by the form within.
Example...the eyes perceive being alive; the third eye comprehends the inception and death that life is balancing in-between; which are out of range for perception.
Form cannot sense flow; comprehension of flow has to be grown; shaped; transmuted by choice based response to perceived inspiration.
Example...flow moves form from beginning towards end (one direction); yet form within has the free will of choice to move left/right; up/down; for/back; through/around); while being moved by flow in one direction. Dominance (balance) causes liberty; from liber "free" (choice); hence free-dom (balance of liberty/dominance).
Just throw stuff at me. I adapt to what inspires anyway.
Shit free-will, either I’ve been reading too much of your posts or you’ve been interacting with too many of us near-normals.... Your prose seems a bit more refined and easier for even a normie to understand with minimal internal repeating and restructuring. Don’t take this as an insult or anything, I just don’t want you to lose your touch. Your style was weird but damnit it was unique, special and an interesting read.
What if you're describing the consequences of your own growth of understanding? If you read that much of me going over the same stuff over and over again; then it becomes harder to ignore getting inspired; and the more one adapts to perceived inspiration; the more one grows comprehended information.
Meanwhile I get more and more proficient in stripping languages of all the suggested rhetoric and inversion; which allows me to de-masquerade ignorance; which when responding to me has few tools left to hide behind.
Within ALL each ONE represents the balance of inspiration for self sustenance or temptation towards ignorance for choice of reaction. I can get the same inspiration out of milking goats; while watching an infant sleeping next to me. It's not what others represent; but what I choose to shape out of it.
It's continuous insults and praises that inspired me to teach/learn myself about placement of evaluation (choice) within value (balance). Just a couple response back someone told me I write a language that nobody understands; and you are with the opposite suggestion. Well; it turns out I'm balancing within value; while the suggested value by others represents a temptation for me to ignore my placement. I resist that. The suggested wants of individual others do not represent collective need.
Want vs not want (reason); while ignoring need. What if input defines output? Also; Stan Bush told me that "It's in the blood, it's in the will" and that "You got the power; you got the motion; you got the touch".
A rhetorical obituary. No rest within movement tho...