Don’t take it from me, I don’t even get to tweet anymore.
Take it from a little place I call the British government. Which admitted today, in its newest vaccine surveillance report, that:
“N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who acquire infection following two doses of vaccination.” (Page 23)
What’s this mean? Several things, all bad. We know the vaccines do not stop infection or transmission of the virus (in fact, the report shows elsewhere that vaccinated adults are now being infected at much HIGHER rates than the unvaccinated).
What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people.
This means vaccinated people will be far more vulnerable to mutations in the spike protein EVEN AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN INFECTED AND RECOVERED ONCE (or more than once, probably).
It also means the virus is likely to select for mutations that go in exactly that direction, because those will essentially give it an enormous vulnerable population to infect. And it probably is still more evidence the vaccines may interfere with the development of robust long-term immunity post-infection.
...the report shows elsewhere that vaccinated adults are now being infected at much HIGHER rates than the unvaccinated).
This is Table 2 (page 13). This phenomenon applies to ages 30 and older and is discussed on the previous page.
This is likely to be due to a variety of reasons, including differences in the population of vaccinated and unvaccinated people as well as differences in testing patterns.
The vaccination status of cases...is not the most appropriate method to assess vaccine effectiveness and there is a high risk of misinterpretation.
In the context of very high vaccine coverage in the population, even with a highly effective vaccine, it is expected that a large proportion of cases...would occur in vaccinated individuals, simply because a larger proportion of the population are vaccinated than unvaccinated and no vaccine is 100% effective. This is especially true because vaccination has been prioritised in individuals who are more susceptible or more at risk of severe disease.
The case rates in the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations are crude rates that do not take into account underlying statistical biases in the data. There are likely to be systematic differences in who chooses to be tested and the COVID risk of people who are vaccinated.
These biases become more evident as more people are vaccinated and the differences between the vaccinated and unvaccinated population become systematically different in ways that are not accounted for without undertaken formal analysis of vaccine effectiveness as is made clear.
Yes they always make excuses for it. But you have to remember this is only what is admitted in official data.
They are doing all they can to fudge the numbers and it still looks bad. But as we saw in the Israel study, "new variant" cases are 7x more likely (after adjusting for age) than someone who has natural immunity. We are at a point now where a very large number of people have naturally seen the virus. So it stands to reasons the numbers of breakthrough cases are going to be higher than what UK government admits.
We called this out 6 months ago. Your immune system is now a subscription service, you will need the gobs jabs every year or any old flu or cold will kill you... these people deserve what they get now
So you mean to tell me, an injection that makes your body produce little spikey things on it's own cells isn't equivalent to encountering the actual respiratory pathogen?
:surprised_pikachu:
I'm going to be even more "surprised" when the rates of auto-immune disorders go through the roof.
Don’t take it from me, I don’t even get to tweet anymore.
Take it from a little place I call the British government. Which admitted today, in its newest vaccine surveillance report, that:
“N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who acquire infection following two doses of vaccination.” (Page 23)
What’s this mean? Several things, all bad. We know the vaccines do not stop infection or transmission of the virus (in fact, the report shows elsewhere that vaccinated adults are now being infected at much HIGHER rates than the unvaccinated).
What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people.
This means vaccinated people will be far more vulnerable to mutations in the spike protein EVEN AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN INFECTED AND RECOVERED ONCE (or more than once, probably).
It also means the virus is likely to select for mutations that go in exactly that direction, because those will essentially give it an enormous vulnerable population to infect. And it probably is still more evidence the vaccines may interfere with the development of robust long-term immunity post-infection.
Aside from that, everything is fine.
source (pdf)
This is Table 2 (page 13). This phenomenon applies to ages 30 and older and is discussed on the previous page.
Yes they always make excuses for it. But you have to remember this is only what is admitted in official data.
They are doing all they can to fudge the numbers and it still looks bad. But as we saw in the Israel study, "new variant" cases are 7x more likely (after adjusting for age) than someone who has natural immunity. We are at a point now where a very large number of people have naturally seen the virus. So it stands to reasons the numbers of breakthrough cases are going to be higher than what UK government admits.
ive been saying this since june...ive presented this idea on GAW and got banned. fkg bizarre.
GAW?
greatawakening sub
We called this out 6 months ago. Your immune system is now a subscription service, you will need the gobs jabs every year or any old flu or cold will kill you... these people deserve what they get now
So you mean to tell me, an injection that makes your body produce little spikey things on it's own cells isn't equivalent to encountering the actual respiratory pathogen?
:surprised_pikachu:
I'm going to be even more "surprised" when the rates of auto-immune disorders go through the roof.
Honestly, it's kinda impressive that it's so horrendously broken in every possible way.