I can't prove shit about this because at the time I thought it was some one just role-playing but I remember the night before the election seeing a greentext or whatever from 4chan from a group who claimed they had hacked in to the die bolt machines and had found a backdoor in the code that was left open for an update patch.
The text claimed that they changed the code to block all ports so that no one else could access or update the machine remotely after they disconnected.
I thought oh this is funny, great now we can hear all about these darknet hackers fudging the election tomorrow.
Well fast forward to vote night and trump actually wins. The democrats are all gobsmacked and confused thinking there was no possible way they lost etc.
Again I've got nothing to back it up now. But it really did seem like that post was correct and that patch not going through to change the vote tallies is why the democrats were in panic mode and blindsided by their loss.
Maybe the poster was full of shit, maybe not, but the behaviour afterwards, at least to me felt like it was the cause of their freak out.
Just to add it was only a few months or weeks later that the teenager was able to do the same thing at a hacking conference (Florida I think) and was able to hack in and change vote totals in under 15 minutes...
Dieboldt is also run/owned by people close with the Clinton's.
Nice example that any simulation means absolutely nothing without replicateable experimental confirmation.
No replicateable experimental proofs for simulation - there are absolutely nothing to talk about, take your shit back and show your experimental results that show your simulation valid. That is how it works in real science.
This applies to every single simulation - from simulations of nuclear reactors or electronic circuits to all that "climate change", "terrorism", "covid" and "cyber attacks".
Talking specifically about MSM and government, If you see a reference to any "simulation results", it is like big red flashing warning with sirens - "This is a total bullshit".
Tinfloil hat theory: Hillary was supposed to lose. Trump comes in, does the showman thing but accomplishes no permanent results, then stops acting like a leader. Country is now well divided with no central resistance, ripe for subjugation.
I can't prove shit about this because at the time I thought it was some one just role-playing but I remember the night before the election seeing a greentext or whatever from 4chan from a group who claimed they had hacked in to the die bolt machines and had found a backdoor in the code that was left open for an update patch. The text claimed that they changed the code to block all ports so that no one else could access or update the machine remotely after they disconnected.
I thought oh this is funny, great now we can hear all about these darknet hackers fudging the election tomorrow.
Well fast forward to vote night and trump actually wins. The democrats are all gobsmacked and confused thinking there was no possible way they lost etc.
Again I've got nothing to back it up now. But it really did seem like that post was correct and that patch not going through to change the vote tallies is why the democrats were in panic mode and blindsided by their loss.
Maybe the poster was full of shit, maybe not, but the behaviour afterwards, at least to me felt like it was the cause of their freak out.
Just to add it was only a few months or weeks later that the teenager was able to do the same thing at a hacking conference (Florida I think) and was able to hack in and change vote totals in under 15 minutes...
Dieboldt is also run/owned by people close with the Clinton's.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/nation/an-11-year-old-changed-election-results-on-a-replica-florida-state-website-in-under-10-minutes
Edit: Nope that's just the websites they did after.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hursti_Hack
Nice example that any simulation means absolutely nothing without replicateable experimental confirmation.
No replicateable experimental proofs for simulation - there are absolutely nothing to talk about, take your shit back and show your experimental results that show your simulation valid. That is how it works in real science.
This applies to every single simulation - from simulations of nuclear reactors or electronic circuits to all that "climate change", "terrorism", "covid" and "cyber attacks".
Talking specifically about MSM and government, If you see a reference to any "simulation results", it is like big red flashing warning with sirens - "This is a total bullshit".
Tinfloil hat theory: Hillary was supposed to lose. Trump comes in, does the showman thing but accomplishes no permanent results, then stops acting like a leader. Country is now well divided with no central resistance, ripe for subjugation.
You aren't including 2000, correct? I'm curious what information you have been looking at.
Thanks for sharing that. I've seen that before and could swear the 2020 spike was even greater.
The vote totals alone aren't enough. Vote totals that are unrealistically high in a voting precinct, however, would be a clear indicator.