It doesn't need to cite any sources. This one is simples, COVID mutated to the point where it could travel beyond the speed of light, and travelled specifally to the same period as the Spanish Flu, destroyed and wiped out most of the Spanish Flu virus/germ/bacteria.
Then Covid decided to hibernate until it could return to its original timeline. Why? Because it is the deadliest virus of all time.
Actually before you had to send agents to physically alter and destroy things, now you can do it remotely and at scale. Plus it reaches more people in less time than ever before, so the reality they wish to create is accreted more quickly. This is the Golden Age of Propaganda, bar none.
I would like for someone to write on the talk page of that Wikipedia article that since the cited WHO report does not cite a source, the report itself is a primary one and therefore not usable on Wikipedia.
Do they just delete this stuff now? As far as I can remember, what they would do with mildly inconvenient talk page content is archive it so more casual users would have to click an additional icon to see it.
3-2-1.. “Covid is the deadliest pandemic ever!”
It doesn't mean much when you know our history is already faked. Just another rearrangement of culture.
It doesn't need to cite any sources. This one is simples, COVID mutated to the point where it could travel beyond the speed of light, and travelled specifally to the same period as the Spanish Flu, destroyed and wiped out most of the Spanish Flu virus/germ/bacteria.
Then Covid decided to hibernate until it could return to its original timeline. Why? Because it is the deadliest virus of all time.
Actually before you had to send agents to physically alter and destroy things, now you can do it remotely and at scale. Plus it reaches more people in less time than ever before, so the reality they wish to create is accreted more quickly. This is the Golden Age of Propaganda, bar none.
I would like for someone to write on the talk page of that Wikipedia article that since the cited WHO report does not cite a source, the report itself is a primary one and therefore not usable on Wikipedia.
it’ll just be deleted
Do they just delete this stuff now? As far as I can remember, what they would do with mildly inconvenient talk page content is archive it so more casual users would have to click an additional icon to see it.