EDIT: Thank you all for the replies. To be more specific, is there good information that the mRNA shots cause the immune system to kill the organism when it is challenged?
EV'IDENCE, noun [Latin evidentia, from video, to see.]
Everything we see represents evidence; yet we are tricked to want confirmation by others about what we see means. What we ignore is that to see implies input offered to our perception through movement; hence movement representing meaning for all communicated to our perceiving senses.
Movement does not communicate true or false; only the suggested meaning of others does.
Only the suggested meaning of others does communicate true (yes) or false (no). Consenting to either causes the conflict of reason (true versus false) among both; which corrupts them to ignore both the source of meaning (movement) and the source of suggested substitute meaning (parasites).
Where is the evidence for this?
EDIT: Thank you all for the replies. To be more specific, is there good information that the mRNA shots cause the immune system to kill the organism when it is challenged?
Everything we see represents evidence; yet we are tricked to want confirmation by others about what we see means. What we ignore is that to see implies input offered to our perception through movement; hence movement representing meaning for all communicated to our perceiving senses.
Movement does not communicate true or false; only the suggested meaning of others does.
Yes
Only the suggested meaning of others does communicate true (yes) or false (no). Consenting to either causes the conflict of reason (true versus false) among both; which corrupts them to ignore both the source of meaning (movement) and the source of suggested substitute meaning (parasites).
I wholeheartedly agree. You appear to have an understanding of language that makes me envious.