EV'IDENCE, noun [Latin evidentia, from video, to see.]
Everything we see represents evidence; yet we are tricked to want confirmation by others about what we see means. What we ignore is that to see implies input offered to our perception through movement; hence movement representing meaning for all communicated to our perceiving senses.
Movement does not communicate true or false; only the suggested meaning of others does.
Only the suggested meaning of others does communicate true (yes) or false (no). Consenting to either causes the conflict of reason (true versus false) among both; which corrupts them to ignore both the source of meaning (movement) and the source of suggested substitute meaning (parasites).
an understanding of language that makes me envious
Resist the temptation of envy and grow your own understanding by adaptation to inspiration; instead of arguing about suggested information.
Nature communicates movement; we react to perceived movement by choice; which led us to shape perceived sound into words to describe perceived sound; which we suggest to each other as meaning. Only movement offers the value of meaning (sound); while our choice represents the reacting evaluation thereof.
ALL meaning is predefined; so that the ONEs within can grow their understanding out of it by choice of reaction.
If you understand the foundation; then you can reverse engineer languages to see how the parasitic few a) obfuscate and omit natural connotations (always about behavior within movement) and b) utilize rhetoric to deceive us to consent to the suggested inversion of everything.
Their main modus operandi is to suggest the inversion of reality through words (idolized meaning aka spell-craft); which when consented to, corrupts us to perceive reality through the lens of suggested meaning by others; and since consent to suggestion represents want over need aka ignorance over adherence to natural law; that ignorance is causing our lack of comprehension.
The way out represents ones struggle to resist the temptation to ignore what nature offers for what others within nature suggest on to consent to (by either believing or not believing it). In short...the choice of need over want instead of want over need. Other helpful tools...inspiration over information and implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false).
Everything we see represents evidence; yet we are tricked to want confirmation by others about what we see means. What we ignore is that to see implies input offered to our perception through movement; hence movement representing meaning for all communicated to our perceiving senses.
Movement does not communicate true or false; only the suggested meaning of others does.
Yes
Only the suggested meaning of others does communicate true (yes) or false (no). Consenting to either causes the conflict of reason (true versus false) among both; which corrupts them to ignore both the source of meaning (movement) and the source of suggested substitute meaning (parasites).
I wholeheartedly agree. You appear to have an understanding of language that makes me envious.
Resist the temptation of envy and grow your own understanding by adaptation to inspiration; instead of arguing about suggested information.
Nature communicates movement; we react to perceived movement by choice; which led us to shape perceived sound into words to describe perceived sound; which we suggest to each other as meaning. Only movement offers the value of meaning (sound); while our choice represents the reacting evaluation thereof.
ALL meaning is predefined; so that the ONEs within can grow their understanding out of it by choice of reaction.
If you understand the foundation; then you can reverse engineer languages to see how the parasitic few a) obfuscate and omit natural connotations (always about behavior within movement) and b) utilize rhetoric to deceive us to consent to the suggested inversion of everything.
Their main modus operandi is to suggest the inversion of reality through words (idolized meaning aka spell-craft); which when consented to, corrupts us to perceive reality through the lens of suggested meaning by others; and since consent to suggestion represents want over need aka ignorance over adherence to natural law; that ignorance is causing our lack of comprehension.
The way out represents ones struggle to resist the temptation to ignore what nature offers for what others within nature suggest on to consent to (by either believing or not believing it). In short...the choice of need over want instead of want over need. Other helpful tools...inspiration over information and implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false).