The chief problem which arises when we apply our theories to any particular situation in the real world. A theory of essentially complex phenomena must refer to a large number of particular facts; and to derive a prediction from it, or to test it, we have to ascertain all these particular facts. Once we succeeded in this there should be no particular difficulty about deriving testable predictions. But there are way to many unknowable facts, and further the real danger consists in the ascertainment of the particular facts after the events have happened to comport to our theories beforehand.
Example: "OF COURSE Biden's vax mandate was all a ploy, never meant to be implemented."
You don't know that, what you're doing is taking information after events have happened and reinterpreting them to comport to your theories afterwards. You backwash your reasoning to fit current events. This way lies charlatanism and worse. Make your testable theories up PRIOR to events, or, at the very least, stick to analyzing events as they happen or after they have happened to try to ascertain what is the most objective truth.
The "Grand Finale" 1 month lockdowns are way more plausible than the vaccine mandates as the kill card.
Unlike vaccines, anyone I talked to about this will instantly know me as a "Schizo" even anti-vaxxers.
However, remember this.
Illuminati history, starting from the Roscurians and apexed by the Jacobins, had only ONE pattern. It follows the same principles, but just simply swapped their narratives.
The narrative/outcome you treated as the lesser of the two evils or even IGNORED -- that's the attack that will KILL you.
Okay, fair prediction. But in America, further lockdowns aren't going to be done because some states will do them and some states won't, as the same for vaccine mandates. We still have the ghostly remnants of the Founder's Republic and states still have power in this regard.
As for you're bit about illuminati history, I'm not sure I 100% understand. It's kinda like saying "why do you always find what you're looking for the last place you seek it" Well, that's because that's where you find it. Likewise, ignored attacks that AREN'T successful won't be the one to kill you, until one does, otherwise they could be safely ignored.
And if the world locks down bar several states, they're basically cornered for good.
It really depends. For example, aliens or Planet-X could be easily ignored until they happen. Then you get to Nazis and Communists where NOBODY will imagine that stuff were a part of the plan (or even take full control of the country), at least during the time where they are active. It's simply impossible to safely ignore the presence of Communists and Nazis during the early 20th century because they are too visible for your own good.
Covid World (decade long lockdowns) follows the same thing. You CANNOT safely ignore it because the warning signs were all there. (WHO planning to name variants over constellations, Singapore returning to pandemic mode despite 80% vaccinated and nobody being serious ill, Havard Business School moving to online classes)
But we have 4 maybe 5 Western European countries, like Denmark, Norway, Finland all dropping all lockdowns and restrictions. Eastern Europe never had any to begin with. There are cross cutting trends. The whole world ain't locking down.
What's happening is entrenched politicians not admitting they were wrong.
It's not because they are denying that they were wrong. What they are doing is deliberate for the sake of control -- a type of destructive control that will not stay long, but will cause as much damage as possible, both psychologically and physically during the window it is allowed.