Why can't she employ logic.

The problem ewaste imposing the solution. But it fixes nothing. It simply exploits greed. More consumption, more services, more demand for an even quicker turnaround. Electronics breaking quicker, how long does a phone last today, 2 years, forced into the next model, even quicker. Apply the phone to every electronic. EVs last less than a decade, less than the oven, dishwasher, fridge, washing machine, microwave lasting on average over decade, but today averaging less than a decade with newer models. Where like the phone, the TV, computer, console, tablet, stereo, last 5 years. Renewables, lasting on average less than two decades supposedly, but less than a decade solar and turbine, forgetting the fact they are obsolete in extreme weather.

I understand she is the dumbest cheerleader to ever exist in human history. She doesn't employ logic. The problem above was electronics. They aren't the solution. She simply forces the next model. It ain't for the climate. It is for simple greed. How much more profit was there in its demand.

To keep its demand inserted, it forces an assumption that it doesn't pollute. As it attacks other supposed emissions to generate increasing reliance on their solution by forcing the problem. But electronics pollute the absolute most out of every other thing combined. They have singlehandedly created climate change. They are made out of fossil fuels and rare earth metals and minerals, and infact they employ the most plastic out of every single product.