This is something that has been bugging me. We see plenty of studies reporting covid related deaths for vaxed/unvaxed. What I'm not able to find is any study reporting deaths unrelated to covid for vaxed/unvaxed.
I believe it's important since the current reporting is never going to blame the vax for increases in death, but it isn't exactly something they'll be able to easily hide from anyone with the ability to compare the two.
Is anyone able to find this information?
its very hard to tell with all the bullshit data. Vars is underrated and only gives us a general idea for the USA. iv read somewhere (ill try and find the link) but one data amylases said she thinks the real number is some where between 5-20 times higher. other estimates are around 250 000 deaths so far. as far as world wide who even knows. it could be well over a million at this point potentially even more .
VAERS will only become useful if they incentivise ze the healthcare workers to add to it. 90%, probably more, only care about money.
When I was vax injured back in the 90s, my mom asked the doctor to report it (she didn't know anything about VAERS but assumed it should be reported to the manufacturer). The doctor said of course he wasn't going to because what happened to me was listed on the insert so there was no point. And that is when my mom and I learned about the inserts, demanded them, and found that informed consent is a lie. We were told nothing could happen.
Doctors don't see the point in reporting because it takes time out of their day and for the most part none of them care in the least about anything but money and not being sued.
They have muddied the water with Vaers because it is open for submissions and therefore being gamed.
The problem is they will never look at the data like that. I'm a data analyst in healthcare. I have access to numbers that should be all kinds of interesting but they seem to purposely avoid anything juicey. It's hard for me to explain because I'm not great with words or explaining what I do.
They track covid positives, suspected covid, number of vaxxed per week, number of covid deaths, but do not store the data so that I could correlate vaxxed and covid positive. They seem to be obsessed with numbers of doses on hand VS given out of remdisivir and the vax but not individuals that take it... There's no follow up of 'died after remdisivir'. And yeah ICU beds used and empty are tracked but they add and take away (which is normal) to keep the numbers in the 85-95% usage range. So please don't pay attention to those numbers when you see them. Look for raw numbers. 20 out of 25 beds. Those numbers will be more meaningful to someone just looking in than the percentages.
I would love to be able to pull vax and cancer data but that's not put into the databases I use. They are being very careful what goes in and make it hard to see anything interesting. Maybe over time as they add more and more pieces of info it will get better, but right now it looks like they are purposefully obfuscating even what they themselves look at.
I couldn't find anything useful which is why I posed the question.
The question for me is: Is the covid vaccine dangerous?
The answer thus far is: No, because those deaths 28 days after vax are unrelated.
Ok then, a better indicator would be to not care about cause of death and see if there is a correlation between those who took the vax and overall mortality ignoring underlying co-morbitities and start with a Yes/No answer. Yes/No the vax appears to increase/not increase the chance of death as compared to the unvaxxed when deaths attributed to covid are removed from the equation.
It seems to me that this would be a no brainer and would answer a let of questions and belay many fears people have about the vax. That we don't have this data and an answer to that question does, to me, point to it being problematic for those who want us to take the vax.
I don’t have the sauce off hand but I’ve confirmed that “breakthrough infections” are not attributed to the “vaccine” if they occur within two weeks after completing the injection schedule. That’s fucked up because almost all “covid” “vaccine” adverse events including deaths occur within 2 days after completing the schedule. I’ll find link.
Sauce:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html
“Defining a vaccine breakthrough infection
For the purpose of this surveillance, a vaccine breakthrough infection is defined as the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen in a respiratory specimen collected from a person ≥14 days after they have completed all recommended doses of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-authorized COVID-19 vaccine.”
If you have a reaction beyond 7 days out it cannot be said it's a reaction to the shot, either. They love playing with the numbers to hide the horror.