Here's a fucking novel idea, you retards: ONLY START A FAMILY WHEN YOU ARE IN A STABLE FINANCIAL SITUATION. 1-earner 1-raiser was the MO of humans for centuries. Maybe just maybe...STOP CONCEIVING CHILDREN IF YOU ARE POOR. Logic. It's not that hard to employ. Oh i forgot where i am. My bad. Fucking US Americans.
No you imbecile, what i am saying is that you shouldn't subject a child to poverty and that children shouldn't be put in daycare so ma and pa can go and be wage-slaves for 8+ hours. Their programming has already gotten to you, you have clearly forgotten that women used to stay at home when they had children. And i very clearly stated "EITHER work OR raise your children".
I haven't forgotten shit. You're out of touch with the present.
It was affordable for one parent to have a shit job and feed a whole family, afford two cars, and a house, even as recently as the 1980s.
This happened because of the banking and insurance industries. Whenever you have to take out a loan for something the price you pay goes up by 2x-3x of buying it outright, and then, over time, inflation sets in, so affordable housing now requires loans, same of cars, and a college education.
Doesn't mean poor people deserve to be childless, or stay at home to raise them and live off welfare, as if that's even an option in most places where rents are going up.
Or you know, you guys could turn on your fucking brains and realize that raising children is expensive and it's unfair to subject a child to a live of poverty. And children raised by trad wives, at home, in a loving evironment aren't the ones
who later become those shithead lefturd NPCs you see out and about.
Here's a fucking novel idea, you retards: ONLY START A FAMILY WHEN YOU ARE IN A STABLE FINANCIAL SITUATION. 1-earner 1-raiser was the MO of humans for centuries. Maybe just maybe...STOP CONCEIVING CHILDREN IF YOU ARE POOR. Logic. It's not that hard to employ. Oh i forgot where i am. My bad. Fucking US Americans.
Good job, so you're saying only the rich are allowed to have kids, wonderful. Isn't that what the depopulators want?
No you imbecile, what i am saying is that you shouldn't subject a child to poverty and that children shouldn't be put in daycare so ma and pa can go and be wage-slaves for 8+ hours. Their programming has already gotten to you, you have clearly forgotten that women used to stay at home when they had children. And i very clearly stated "EITHER work OR raise your children".
I haven't forgotten shit. You're out of touch with the present.
It was affordable for one parent to have a shit job and feed a whole family, afford two cars, and a house, even as recently as the 1980s.
This happened because of the banking and insurance industries. Whenever you have to take out a loan for something the price you pay goes up by 2x-3x of buying it outright, and then, over time, inflation sets in, so affordable housing now requires loans, same of cars, and a college education.
Doesn't mean poor people deserve to be childless, or stay at home to raise them and live off welfare, as if that's even an option in most places where rents are going up.
I stand by my words. Trad life is best life. One at home, one at work.
tl;dr : Poor people should not have children.
OK, well, that's . . . advanced.
Stop being poor.
You should slap yo momma for doing such a poor job raising you,well probably did the best she could with the failed medium but smack her anyhow.
Or you know, you guys could turn on your fucking brains and realize that raising children is expensive and it's unfair to subject a child to a live of poverty. And children raised by trad wives, at home, in a loving evironment aren't the ones who later become those shithead lefturd NPCs you see out and about.