Definitely should burn old photos of my ancestors with backgrounds showing a house walls with guns openly hanging and ones with boys shooting cans from early 1950-s. Also have to forget family stories. Because somebody in internet read some articles in internet about how draconian was laws in the past.
You never heard about continious rewriting of the official history, especially in Russia, Didn't you?
Sport, the plural of anecdote is not data. I don’t care what you claim your family has or doesn’t have in pictures.
And by all means, if you have evidence these primary sourced laws I cited are ‘rewritten’ then by all means demonstrate it. But you claiming history gets rewritten does not give you license to rewrite it yourself.
I don't care much about all that historic crap to bother myself with spending time to dig proofs for some internet nickname. And how that proofs should look like to satisfy you? Some official site where will be another document saying that some other document was rewritten, with stamps and signatures? Are you kidding me?
You could easily find articles about how USSR authorities edited photos and pictures even in scholar books, removing objectionable persons from images. Stalin shills removed his enemies from books, changed historic facts and documents to fit the narrative, then, Khrushchev shills removed Stalin and Co from history and changed facts and documents to fit the narrative, Then Khrushchev become unwanted in history... Even national anthem had changed few times. Archives definitely was edited too, some documents disappeared, some appeared, not event taking in account that huge part of USSR archves, especially documents from 1920-s to 1970-s, many other documents linked to is still classified (or said that they are classified because they just don't exists - nobody knows).
In official documents you will find only the things they want you to find. It is not a good and verifiable source of information at all and never was. History is written by winners, is that a discovery for you? The only way you could know something about the past is your relatives memories. Everything else is much worse source of information about history.
You have to be completely retarded asking some "proofs" of rewriting documents when right now that fucking WHO and health institutions of every fucking country rewriting history, documents and even science RIGHT BEFORE YOUR OWN EYES IN REALTIME.
History is not a science, so there could not be a solid scientific proofs. Why spent time for that crap?
That’s an awfully long winded way of saying you have absolutely no evidence whatsoever for any of your assertions.
Yes Soviet history was rewritten by Stalin and his successors and we know that from the best primary source history books which have traced that rewriting in great detail. Your lack of education about history does not mean you get to rewrite it arbitrarily to suit your personal whims.
we know that from the best primary source history books which have traced that rewriting in great detail.
Written and published by whom? :) Some biased writers whose books published only because what they wrote was suitable for publishers? What about books you never heard about because they was never published? They exists and a lot. Also with documents and other stuff. Try to find, say, "The assasination of Stalin and Beriya" by Y.Muhin. That is the view you definitely never heard about with perfect documentary proofs and solid logic. Does that mean that it is final truth about historic events? Not at all. Just like any other history book, especially widely promoted "best primary source" ones.
Your lack of education about history
You mean "lack of indoctrination about one version of history"?
Definitely should burn old photos of my ancestors with backgrounds showing a house walls with guns openly hanging and ones with boys shooting cans from early 1950-s. Also have to forget family stories. Because somebody in internet read some articles in internet about how draconian was laws in the past.
You never heard about continious rewriting of the official history, especially in Russia, Didn't you?
Sport, the plural of anecdote is not data. I don’t care what you claim your family has or doesn’t have in pictures.
And by all means, if you have evidence these primary sourced laws I cited are ‘rewritten’ then by all means demonstrate it. But you claiming history gets rewritten does not give you license to rewrite it yourself.
I don't care much about all that historic crap to bother myself with spending time to dig proofs for some internet nickname. And how that proofs should look like to satisfy you? Some official site where will be another document saying that some other document was rewritten, with stamps and signatures? Are you kidding me?
You could easily find articles about how USSR authorities edited photos and pictures even in scholar books, removing objectionable persons from images. Stalin shills removed his enemies from books, changed historic facts and documents to fit the narrative, then, Khrushchev shills removed Stalin and Co from history and changed facts and documents to fit the narrative, Then Khrushchev become unwanted in history... Even national anthem had changed few times. Archives definitely was edited too, some documents disappeared, some appeared, not event taking in account that huge part of USSR archves, especially documents from 1920-s to 1970-s, many other documents linked to is still classified (or said that they are classified because they just don't exists - nobody knows).
In official documents you will find only the things they want you to find. It is not a good and verifiable source of information at all and never was. History is written by winners, is that a discovery for you? The only way you could know something about the past is your relatives memories. Everything else is much worse source of information about history.
You have to be completely retarded asking some "proofs" of rewriting documents when right now that fucking WHO and health institutions of every fucking country rewriting history, documents and even science RIGHT BEFORE YOUR OWN EYES IN REALTIME.
History is not a science, so there could not be a solid scientific proofs. Why spent time for that crap?
He is a shill. You shouldn't waste the effort.
I know. One from Holocaust myth, based only on "plural of anecdote", believers sect.
You still whining about me? Your obsession is not productive.
That’s an awfully long winded way of saying you have absolutely no evidence whatsoever for any of your assertions.
Yes Soviet history was rewritten by Stalin and his successors and we know that from the best primary source history books which have traced that rewriting in great detail. Your lack of education about history does not mean you get to rewrite it arbitrarily to suit your personal whims.
Written and published by whom? :) Some biased writers whose books published only because what they wrote was suitable for publishers? What about books you never heard about because they was never published? They exists and a lot. Also with documents and other stuff. Try to find, say, "The assasination of Stalin and Beriya" by Y.Muhin. That is the view you definitely never heard about with perfect documentary proofs and solid logic. Does that mean that it is final truth about historic events? Not at all. Just like any other history book, especially widely promoted "best primary source" ones.
You mean "lack of indoctrination about one version of history"?
Hmm, like what you try and do with "Trump cultists" but ignore real cultists that support Biden. okay