Those who’ve Seen Q: Into the Storm... What do you make of it? Share your thoughts.
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
Nature is nothingness, according to science. It was originally nothing and then something. It’s a big bang.
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
What we perceive represents movement; because we represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death). What corrupts us to comprehend perceived movement is consenting to suggested scient-ism. Why? Because consenting to believe any suggestion affixes any assumptions within movement as being "true" or "false".
Neither true or false states exist within movement; hence nature not branding itself by words. Nature moves all within; which we perceive as inspiration to react to by choice (adaptation). Others suggest us to believe affixed information aka idolized meaning (words) aka spell-craft.
Suggestion/consent represents the parasitic exploitation of offer/consent under natural law aka flow offers ALL for the formed ONEs within. How can flow cause form? Momentum aka balance within motion aka ongoing velocity (flow) meeting temporary resistance (form).
That represents the suggestion of "creation"; which suggests that one created all; which implies creation out of nothing.
Meanwhile in reality....ALL (flow) allows each ONE (form) within to "transmute" out of aka transmutation out of base (energy aka flow/form aka self sustenance of ALL information).
We cannot create anything "new" without using everything offered to our perception as inspiration to transmute it out of.
Everything that was; is or can be represent ALL information (aka the potentiality of energy). Flow represents the ongoing loss thereof; while the resulting form represents the temporary growth potential within the loss of potentiality. Both (flow/form) are in balance with each other; the very balance that our free will of choice represents the reaction to.
How do you trick choice to ignore reacting to balance? You simply suggest them to consent to choices instead...your suggested choices. Those who consent to belief; perceive reality through the lens of beliefs formed by the choice of others.
I think you may be Dr. Bronner reincarnated. Your soap is my favorite, btw.
That represents flow to form (inception) and form to flow (death) aka ONE out of ALL transmutation...yet each ONE needs to be different; which is what differentiates form (potential) from flow (potentiality). Adding to this comes mankinds lack of comprehension towards the shared identity of the self that can be sustained as form within flow...the blood within the bloodline aka the which remains of temporary form within ongoing flow.
That seems to be either a vetting tool for those with eyes to see; or yet another blatant front for endless suggested genocides... https://pic8.co/sh/HG98jm.jpg
"Whatever divides is better than whatever unites"...that represents the suggested inversion of reality; for as united energy, flow divides us into form within energy, so that which unites also divides. Energy (flow/form) represents balance for self sustenance within constant movement.