TL;DR: Natural immunity doesn't exist in the EU and Italy either.
The EU and Italy doesn't follow the science at all.
First of all the EU regulation for recovery certification is only valid for 6 months, exactly the same schedule as boosters, imagine how the vaxxtards would rage if recovery was implied to be stronger.
Secondly: Proof of antibodies or T-cells are invalid reasons for a certificate of recovery, you have to have a PCR positive test for covid and then a negative test 11 days later.
So me personally who had covid a year ago can't get a certificate of recovery since 6 months have passed.
Will there be a minimum validity of the certificates?
On 31 May, the Commission proposed to update the Council recommendation on the coordination of the travel measures, which includes standard validity periods for tests: 72 hours for PCR tests and, where accepted by a Member State, 48 hours for rapid antigen tests.
The Regulation also introduces some basic principles, for example, setting the maximum validity period of the certificate of recovery at 180 days. These principles could be adjusted by the Commission on the basis of new scientific evidence. The Regulation in any case ensures that certificates issued by other Member States are accepted following the same rules as the ones applied to nationally issued certificates.
There is no maximum validity foreseen for vaccination certificates, as this will depend on emerging scientific evidence as to the length of protection of the different vaccines.
This is enlightening. The antibody test is not a good indicator of immunity because the T-cells are more important, and that is a different test. Six months is just their ballpark figure. Not very scientific, but some individuals retains antibodies longer than others.
EDIT: RAAAGE!!
...imagine how the vaxxtards would rage if recovery was implied to be stronger.
TL;DR: Natural immunity doesn't exist in the EU and Italy either.
The EU and Italy doesn't follow the science at all.
First of all the EU regulation for recovery certification is only valid for 6 months, exactly the same schedule as boosters, imagine how the vaxxtards would rage if recovery was implied to be stronger.
Secondly: Proof of antibodies or T-cells are invalid reasons for a certificate of recovery, you have to have a PCR positive test for covid and then a negative test 11 days later.
So me personally who had covid a year ago can't get a certificate of recovery since 6 months have passed.
Precisely the issue.
Source or gtfo
Sorry for late answer wasn't on here for a while.
It's literally in the Q&A section.
In spite of science proving 17 years immunity to SARS they keep it at 180 days
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/QANDA_21_2781
EU member states are free to set their own entry requirements and these requirements are subject to change.
https://www.etiasvisa.com/etias-news/pcr-covid-testing-travel-europe
From this list, it looks like Austria accepts proof of past infection and Greece accepts proof of infection within the past 2-9 months.
He did because there was some early data showing the jab helping with long covid which he was suffering from.
It didn’t help.
About 6 weeks later he took ivermectin and is right as rain.
Is it possible that you are replying to the wrong comments?
Source for what? That they push that BS in Europe? Well they do. Most places it's 6 months or less even if "tested positive with PCR" etc.
This is enlightening. The antibody test is not a good indicator of immunity because the T-cells are more important, and that is a different test. Six months is just their ballpark figure. Not very scientific, but some individuals retains antibodies longer than others.
EDIT: RAAAGE!!
Having SARS-CoV-2 once confers much greater immunity than a vaccine—but vaccination remains vital https://www.science.org/content/article/having-sars-cov-2-once-confers-much-greater-immunity-vaccine-vaccination-remains-vital