"A. D. Santin1, D. E. Scheim2, P. A. McCullough3, M. Yagisawa4and T. J. Borody51)Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT,2)US Public Health Service, Inactive Reserve, Blacksburg,VA,3)Texas A & M College of Medicine, Dallas, TX, USA,4)Omura Satoshi Memorial Institute, Infection Control Research Center, Kitasato University, Tokyo,Japan and5)Centre for Digestive Diseases, New South Wales, Australia"
You're mistaking PubMed with the authors on it. PubMed is a central website that hosts papers from EVERYONE. It does not endorse or deny any papers.
That's part of the peer review process. Other people who are also scientists review the papers. Once the papers are reviewed they make it from preprint to print and show up in various journals. Some papers are open and available, others you can only see the abstracts.
This is sort of like The Library of Congress. The books it has on its shelves are not books Congress published, but rather collected from all publishers.
Please learn a bit more about what you're trying to talk about and how it works. Not trying to attack you.
Sorry, but there is, it's real. It was a chimera made at the Wuhan Institute of Virology with technical help from NIAD and monetary help from NIAD via Echo Health Alliance, and directly, and overseen by FauXi himself. There are also ties to a US virology lab in NC that also worked on gain of function research.
They may not have isolated in vivo, but they certainly had the full RNA sequences for it from that same lab before it was deleted from their online database, on or around Sep 12, 2019, probably after they realized the CCP made it escape on purpose, probably to have an excuse to quash the Hong Kong Protests.
Search Elg... Yup, that same retracted Elgazzar study is in here, which massively influences any positive results because it was garbage.
It also goes on to cite the exact same 20 some odd studies with VERY low numbers that every meta study seems to cite.
It would be great if Iver worked well, unfortunately I just see randomness still. Many of the studies also don't take into mind all the other drugs people were taking. So in some of them they were taking Iver and a bunch of other shit.
This has to be isolated awa from other medications and proven properly in a controlled test. Larger scale than some of these 20 patient studies that are cited.
Not quite true.
"A. D. Santin1, D. E. Scheim2, P. A. McCullough3, M. Yagisawa4and T. J. Borody51)Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT,2)US Public Health Service, Inactive Reserve, Blacksburg,VA,3)Texas A & M College of Medicine, Dallas, TX, USA,4)Omura Satoshi Memorial Institute, Infection Control Research Center, Kitasato University, Tokyo,Japan and5)Centre for Digestive Diseases, New South Wales, Australia"
That's not an NIH paper, that's from our friends.
NIH is pwned by the great resetters.
Did you look at the URL ?
You're mistaking PubMed with the authors on it. PubMed is a central website that hosts papers from EVERYONE. It does not endorse or deny any papers.
That's part of the peer review process. Other people who are also scientists review the papers. Once the papers are reviewed they make it from preprint to print and show up in various journals. Some papers are open and available, others you can only see the abstracts.
This is sort of like The Library of Congress. The books it has on its shelves are not books Congress published, but rather collected from all publishers.
Please learn a bit more about what you're trying to talk about and how it works. Not trying to attack you.
There is no virus
What would convince you otherwise?
https://rense.com//general96/marine-jab.mp4
Sorry, but there is, it's real. It was a chimera made at the Wuhan Institute of Virology with technical help from NIAD and monetary help from NIAD via Echo Health Alliance, and directly, and overseen by FauXi himself. There are also ties to a US virology lab in NC that also worked on gain of function research.
They may not have isolated in vivo, but they certainly had the full RNA sequences for it from that same lab before it was deleted from their online database, on or around Sep 12, 2019, probably after they realized the CCP made it escape on purpose, probably to have an excuse to quash the Hong Kong Protests.
Wuhan october 2019 military olympics.
Real. A real dud.
NEW PAPER... Checks date... 2021 Aug 3
I mean MONTH OLD PAPER.
Search Elg... Yup, that same retracted Elgazzar study is in here, which massively influences any positive results because it was garbage.
It also goes on to cite the exact same 20 some odd studies with VERY low numbers that every meta study seems to cite.
It would be great if Iver worked well, unfortunately I just see randomness still. Many of the studies also don't take into mind all the other drugs people were taking. So in some of them they were taking Iver and a bunch of other shit.
This has to be isolated awa from other medications and proven properly in a controlled test. Larger scale than some of these 20 patient studies that are cited.