The Democrats have already introduced HR 4980, directing “the Secretary of Homeland Security to ensure that any individual traveling on a flight that departs from or arrives to an airport inside the United States or a territory of the United States is fully vaccinated against COVID-19, and for other purposes.” The Atlantic and other controlled media outlets parroted the Orwellian proposal.
If this escalates, then tens of millions of Americans will be classified as “domestic terrorists” banned from travel, and then stripped of their firearms. First, they put you on the no-fly list, then they can automatically put you on a no-gun-buy list, as the Democrats have proposed for years. The No Fly, No Buy, Gun Control law has bipartisan support. Joe Biden, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump have all supported a national security system that places Americans on a “no fly list” if there is reasonable suspicion to believe they pose a threat to public safety. These politicians all agree that Americans who are placed on this “no fly list” should also be put on a “no gun buy list” that would block them from purchasing firearms from a federally licensed dealer.
Just induce a mass Hodolomor like scenario -- like Decade-long lockdowns with only 1 hour of "free time", and the gun owners will perish on their own due to lack of food.
The bullets do not protect you against hunger, and unvaccinated people will be targeted equally to the vaccinated.
When I think of Mike Adams, I think of this: ‘The independent media has been afflicted with a dangerous new contagion that I’m calling “Stupid-19.” It’s characterized by people who believe viruses aren’t real and that, in their view, all the covid-19 deaths around the globe have been faked in order to trick the public.’
Yeah, here he is 6 months ago interviewing Tom Cowan and getting a little offended and upset at the notion, defending his opinions in the post you shared.
Here he is just yesterday, interviewing Tom Cowan and Andrew Kaufman on the same topic and admitting that he thinks he was wrong and that this position now seems the most likely based on the information.
David Icke was right again (probably). I never read the article you posted before today, but he was definitely very rude towards David Icke who was paving the way for him for a long time. David Icke is anything but stupid. David Icke is probably not right about everything, but time has shown that many of his even “extreme” sounding assertions have turned out to be right.
Point being is that not everyone is right about everything. Being right about everything isn’t as much of a mark of intelligence as being able to admit you were wrong when new information comes your way.
If you compare the videos, you can see how hard of a time he had of accepting the theory (or lack of) in the first one. It took him time to come around. That’s fine. I do think he is authentic, though I don’t agree with or like everything he says. I don’t watch his personal reports often anymore, but his interviews are great.
It would be like dismissing someone telling you the sky was blue because they were a Christian and you are not, or vice versa. Yeah the reputation of the messenger is important, but staying focused on the point instead of the messenger is also important. Refuting the characteristics of the messenger and not their assertion is called ad hominem. Just some thoughts.
lol. as if we need laws to have a gun here when it comes to civil war ;)
To bad I lost all my guns in a tragic boating accident.
The Democrats have already introduced HR 4980, directing “the Secretary of Homeland Security to ensure that any individual traveling on a flight that departs from or arrives to an airport inside the United States or a territory of the United States is fully vaccinated against COVID-19, and for other purposes.” The Atlantic and other controlled media outlets parroted the Orwellian proposal.
If this escalates, then tens of millions of Americans will be classified as “domestic terrorists” banned from travel, and then stripped of their firearms. First, they put you on the no-fly list, then they can automatically put you on a no-gun-buy list, as the Democrats have proposed for years. The No Fly, No Buy, Gun Control law has bipartisan support. Joe Biden, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump have all supported a national security system that places Americans on a “no fly list” if there is reasonable suspicion to believe they pose a threat to public safety. These politicians all agree that Americans who are placed on this “no fly list” should also be put on a “no gun buy list” that would block them from purchasing firearms from a federally licensed dealer.
As a wise man once said;
"Next time I say "shoot the fucker", SHOOT THE FUCKER"
-Abraham Lincoln (probably)
They do not even need to.
Just induce a mass Hodolomor like scenario -- like Decade-long lockdowns with only 1 hour of "free time", and the gun owners will perish on their own due to lack of food.
The bullets do not protect you against hunger, and unvaccinated people will be targeted equally to the vaccinated.
You dont seem to understand how things work.
When I think of Mike Adams, I think of this: ‘The independent media has been afflicted with a dangerous new contagion that I’m calling “Stupid-19.” It’s characterized by people who believe viruses aren’t real and that, in their view, all the covid-19 deaths around the globe have been faked in order to trick the public.’
https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-04-09-new-brain-damaging-disease-stupid-19-coronavirus-hoax.html#
Yeah, here he is 6 months ago interviewing Tom Cowan and getting a little offended and upset at the notion, defending his opinions in the post you shared.
https://www.brighteon.com/987db2c5-7a6a-425a-a464-d197cc8c701c
Here he is just yesterday, interviewing Tom Cowan and Andrew Kaufman on the same topic and admitting that he thinks he was wrong and that this position now seems the most likely based on the information.
https://www.brighteon.com/08e2ac4b-461e-4852-b8cf-2c2bded2a1ea
David Icke was right again (probably). I never read the article you posted before today, but he was definitely very rude towards David Icke who was paving the way for him for a long time. David Icke is anything but stupid. David Icke is probably not right about everything, but time has shown that many of his even “extreme” sounding assertions have turned out to be right.
Point being is that not everyone is right about everything. Being right about everything isn’t as much of a mark of intelligence as being able to admit you were wrong when new information comes your way.
If you compare the videos, you can see how hard of a time he had of accepting the theory (or lack of) in the first one. It took him time to come around. That’s fine. I do think he is authentic, though I don’t agree with or like everything he says. I don’t watch his personal reports often anymore, but his interviews are great.
It would be like dismissing someone telling you the sky was blue because they were a Christian and you are not, or vice versa. Yeah the reputation of the messenger is important, but staying focused on the point instead of the messenger is also important. Refuting the characteristics of the messenger and not their assertion is called ad hominem. Just some thoughts.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a3/Graham's_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement-en.svg/707px-Graham's_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement-en.svg.png