Yeah, here he is 6 months ago interviewing Tom Cowan and getting a little offended and upset at the notion, defending his opinions in the post you shared.
Here he is just yesterday, interviewing Tom Cowan and Andrew Kaufman on the same topic and admitting that he thinks he was wrong and that this position now seems the most likely based on the information.
David Icke was right again (probably). I never read the article you posted before today, but he was definitely very rude towards David Icke who was paving the way for him for a long time. David Icke is anything but stupid. David Icke is probably not right about everything, but time has shown that many of his even “extreme” sounding assertions have turned out to be right.
Point being is that not everyone is right about everything. Being right about everything isn’t as much of a mark of intelligence as being able to admit you were wrong when new information comes your way.
If you compare the videos, you can see how hard of a time he had of accepting the theory (or lack of) in the first one. It took him time to come around. That’s fine. I do think he is authentic, though I don’t agree with or like everything he says. I don’t watch his personal reports often anymore, but his interviews are great.
It would be like dismissing someone telling you the sky was blue because they were a Christian and you are not, or vice versa. Yeah the reputation of the messenger is important, but staying focused on the point instead of the messenger is also important. Refuting the characteristics of the messenger and not their assertion is called ad hominem. Just some thoughts.
Yeah, here he is 6 months ago interviewing Tom Cowan and getting a little offended and upset at the notion, defending his opinions in the post you shared.
https://www.brighteon.com/987db2c5-7a6a-425a-a464-d197cc8c701c
Here he is just yesterday, interviewing Tom Cowan and Andrew Kaufman on the same topic and admitting that he thinks he was wrong and that this position now seems the most likely based on the information.
https://www.brighteon.com/08e2ac4b-461e-4852-b8cf-2c2bded2a1ea
David Icke was right again (probably). I never read the article you posted before today, but he was definitely very rude towards David Icke who was paving the way for him for a long time. David Icke is anything but stupid. David Icke is probably not right about everything, but time has shown that many of his even “extreme” sounding assertions have turned out to be right.
Point being is that not everyone is right about everything. Being right about everything isn’t as much of a mark of intelligence as being able to admit you were wrong when new information comes your way.
If you compare the videos, you can see how hard of a time he had of accepting the theory (or lack of) in the first one. It took him time to come around. That’s fine. I do think he is authentic, though I don’t agree with or like everything he says. I don’t watch his personal reports often anymore, but his interviews are great.
It would be like dismissing someone telling you the sky was blue because they were a Christian and you are not, or vice versa. Yeah the reputation of the messenger is important, but staying focused on the point instead of the messenger is also important. Refuting the characteristics of the messenger and not their assertion is called ad hominem. Just some thoughts.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a3/Graham's_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement-en.svg/707px-Graham's_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement-en.svg.png