Venus Photos from 1981 Show Signs of Editing/Fakery
(www.reddit.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Have you watched any of the videos on symbology in space agencies around the world? They are definitely in cahoots, almost regardless of country. I would say the situation is similar to Antarctica.
I would still find it very difficult to believe that most of space is fake and gay EXCEPT for Russian probe photos. There's been definite fakery from China as well.
I agree they are in cahoots, but in the early days, NASA faked images and missions from the get go (when they realised they could not get people to the moon alive), whereas Russia didn't.
The info gleaned from these early Russian missions and explorations is valuable because it appears to be real info.
For example, cosmonauts could not last long in space, in cramped confines of spacecraft. When they came back after a couple of days they were near death (infarction). Whereas NASA astronauts emerge from allegedly weeks long mission with big smiles!
However Russia has never called out NASA on it's obvious fakes despite the obvious discrepancies such as above. There is an agreement in place. But who knows when that might break down.
As to China, they have clearly done fakes, but then they also produced lunar rover pictures that showed a brown surface which were probably real. Maybe that was a message to USA?
So did Russia ever start with faking things as well? You said the early ones were valuable...well, what made them switch then?
I think Russia didn't do fakes since America was far superior in producing special effects in cinema and photography and had more money. NASA's fakes were convincing enough that they still convince most to this day.
Think about it like this: compare films from the time; a good comparison is "2001: A Space Odyssey" and "Solaris" - both excellent space films, but the effects in 2001 are far more ingenious and convincing than those in the Russian film "Solaris". US military already had a fully equipped movie studio in Laurel Canyon for producing all kinds of propaganda; some say it was better equipped than even the top Hollywood studios.
I don't think Russia switched particularly; the venus missions are from the 80's for example. NASA's success probably put them off funding much real space exploration stuff, that was already going to be expensive, boring, and essentially unimpressive compared with America's elaborate fakery.
It was not always that way. May be you don't know, but there was a Soviet movie "Planet of storms" (Планета бурь) filmed in 1961 by Pavel Klushantsev. Interesting, that it was about joint USSR and US expedition to Venus. Venus was pictured as habitable planet with flora and fauna. I think it is not a problem to find that movie on the net with English subtitles or dubbing. The level of effects is near StarTrek Original series filmed 5 years later. If you like scifi, spend some time to watch it, it is really a milestone in scifi movies. It was even counterfeited and cutted, with removing everything that resemble USSR, even names in credits was changed to English-like ones, by some US studio and sold in US as "Voyage to the Prehistoric Planet" in 1965. :) Stanley Kubrick and George Lucas was aware of Soviet movie and tried to connect with Klushaktsev. Robert Skotak (special effects in Terminator 2) meet with Klushantsev in 1992.
So, initially USSR was a leader in space scifi, but things quickly changed in magic 1970, and there was no any noticeable scifi movies in USSR since then.
Also interesting, that few scientists participate in developing movie, including designing Venus surface. Scientists in USSR really believe that Venus potentially could be habitable. That is why USSR spend a lot of effort and money to explore Venus with Venera probes. Also it could be a reason to abandon lunar exploration in spite of Lunokhod missions success. Why spend money for lifeless Moon and Mars if there is potentially habitable Venus? However, future Venera missions show that Venus is far from habitable. Venera program was cutted. With USSR destruction Russian space industry switched to commercial and international projects with visible revenue.
As for all that questions about fake space exploration, really it does not matter at all. Technology definitely developed to the level when it is possible. It is possible to send probes to other planets, men on the Moon, drive robotic rovers on Mars and pick some mud from asteroids. But it is expensive and gives a little profit.
I dunno, seems a bit much that they would conclude it would be "boring"...I would say any pictures of another planet are valuable.
But all in all I'm still skeptical that ANY of these pictures (from Mars or Venus) are from the actual surface of that planet.
Side note: The Lookout at Laurel Canyon is now owned by Jared Leto, who likely is a cult-running Satanist. One of my siblings was in a 30 Seconds to Mars video. Weird world, man.