Venus Photos from 1981 Show Signs of Editing/Fakery
(www.reddit.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
The original photos were made with a scanner and they are long narrow panoramas. Everyone ever taken can be seen here:
https://www.planetary.org/articles/every-picture-from-venus-surface-ever
In the reddit post it's an image someone 'shopped, to try and make it look like a normal photo, as if you were standing there.
When trying to prove a fake, always find as close to the original image as possible.
What you said is definitely true.
I did zero due diligence on this post.
There's actually less photos than I would have thought too (and I believe I've seen them before).
So are the panoramas themselves actually from the surface of Venus? Or from Devon Island, like another poster quipped about the Mars photos?
I remember reading an essay about early Mars probes and how they basically stated that they weren't going to find anything interesting because they always to choose to land in the safest spots, which are usually level and rather devoid of features. Always struck me as an easy excuse to explain away how uninteresting the photos are. Why not land somewhat near Olympus Mons and have a gander?
These were the only photos that could be obtained and transmitted before the lander succumbed to the adverse conditions on the surface. The 2 landers were Russian, not American/NASA.
It's an interesting topic, which I believe may be sensitive issue for some, but in general NASA is the space agency that does the fakes. Devon Island is a NASA project. I don't think I've ever seen a researcher call Russia out on any faked images.
In fact you can use some Russian images to prove NASA images are fakes - since early Russian satellite color images of the earth from the moon's perspective show the surface of the moon as a shade of brown, which correlates with spectral analysis done of the color of the moon's surface. However these things were still vaguely understood when NASA did it's first fakes of the moons surface, and they made it gray since that was the color they thought was accurate. It has been proved at various times in the past though, before and since the Apollo missions, that the surface is dark to light brown and not gray at all as seen in Apollo imagery; but this fact quietly ignored.
Detailed article on this topic:
The brown color of the moon is an established scientific fact!
Have you watched any of the videos on symbology in space agencies around the world? They are definitely in cahoots, almost regardless of country. I would say the situation is similar to Antarctica.
I would still find it very difficult to believe that most of space is fake and gay EXCEPT for Russian probe photos. There's been definite fakery from China as well.
I agree they are in cahoots, but in the early days, NASA faked images and missions from the get go (when they realised they could not get people to the moon alive), whereas Russia didn't.
The info gleaned from these early Russian missions and explorations is valuable because it appears to be real info.
For example, cosmonauts could not last long in space, in cramped confines of spacecraft. When they came back after a couple of days they were near death (infarction). Whereas NASA astronauts emerge from allegedly weeks long mission with big smiles!
However Russia has never called out NASA on it's obvious fakes despite the obvious discrepancies such as above. There is an agreement in place. But who knows when that might break down.
As to China, they have clearly done fakes, but then they also produced lunar rover pictures that showed a brown surface which were probably real. Maybe that was a message to USA?