Seems sus to me. It isn't written like a research paper. No abstract, method, conclusion, citation, acknowledgments, footnotes-- no submission for peer review of any kind. Seems thrown-together by someone trying to sound sciencey.
I think they use Luxembourg because it helps to suspend disbelief. Because even if you don't see magnetic effects on vaxxed people in your own country, who's to say that the shots in Luxembourg aren't different somehow? How many of you know somebody in Luxembourg who can replicate this experiment for us?
it is because the study was cancelled half way through, if you had read it to the end you would have known. you cant publish a scientific paper on a aborted study, so they just released their raw documentation
I did read that part. But that info doesn't make the article more or less believable. There simply isn't enough information to confirm or deny the study's findings, and the format still makes the information feel suspect, sudden cancelation of the study notwithstanding.
Found "no safety or efficacy issues"
I wonder if they went ahead and conducted a super fast double blind placebo with the contaminated vials to determine this.
Holy shit, why is even the craziest conspiracy theory becoming true?
also. here a study of electromagnetism of vaccinated person from luxembourg, for further reading: https://efvv.eu/images/content/2021/0617/study-on-electromagnetism-of-vaccinated-persons-in-luxembourg_6edfa.pdf
Seems sus to me. It isn't written like a research paper. No abstract, method, conclusion, citation, acknowledgments, footnotes-- no submission for peer review of any kind. Seems thrown-together by someone trying to sound sciencey.
I think they use Luxembourg because it helps to suspend disbelief. Because even if you don't see magnetic effects on vaxxed people in your own country, who's to say that the shots in Luxembourg aren't different somehow? How many of you know somebody in Luxembourg who can replicate this experiment for us?
it is because the study was cancelled half way through, if you had read it to the end you would have known. you cant publish a scientific paper on a aborted study, so they just released their raw documentation
I did read that part. But that info doesn't make the article more or less believable. There simply isn't enough information to confirm or deny the study's findings, and the format still makes the information feel suspect, sudden cancelation of the study notwithstanding.
I've not seen that, but I want to. Do you have a link?
Yeeeaahhhh, I'm going to maintain some skepticism.
Found "no safety or efficacy issues" I wonder if they went ahead and conducted a super fast double blind placebo with the contaminated vials to determine this.
Bill Gates said you are not supposed to test them first.
Let's upvote this on r/conspiracy it's getting brigaded by downvotes now. https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/pc089i/did_japan_just_find_magnetic_particles_in_moderna/
lol who gives a shit about reddit. reddit is literally the chinese space of free speech
!!! is this real?
Did Japan just expose #magnetgate? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGUMsxVt4YU&list=RDoGUMsxVt4YU
Graphene Oxide, I am afraid.
Almeria study? Have you made a post about it here yet, first I've heard of it. Or was that the Spanish study by Delgado?
but i thought it was just a conspiracy!?!! there is nooo metal!! YOU ARE ALL NUTS!!!
o.O
Could also be remains from the production process that got into the liquid, regardless of what it is, it shouldn't be injected in humans