Seems sus to me. It isn't written like a research paper. No abstract, method, conclusion, citation, acknowledgments, footnotes-- no submission for peer review of any kind. Seems thrown-together by someone trying to sound sciencey.
I think they use Luxembourg because it helps to suspend disbelief. Because even if you don't see magnetic effects on vaxxed people in your own country, who's to say that the shots in Luxembourg aren't different somehow? How many of you know somebody in Luxembourg who can replicate this experiment for us?
it is because the study was cancelled half way through, if you had read it to the end you would have known. you cant publish a scientific paper on a aborted study, so they just released their raw documentation
I did read that part. But that info doesn't make the article more or less believable. There simply isn't enough information to confirm or deny the study's findings, and the format still makes the information feel suspect, sudden cancelation of the study notwithstanding.
Holy shit, why is even the craziest conspiracy theory becoming true?
also. here a study of electromagnetism of vaccinated person from luxembourg, for further reading: https://efvv.eu/images/content/2021/0617/study-on-electromagnetism-of-vaccinated-persons-in-luxembourg_6edfa.pdf
Seems sus to me. It isn't written like a research paper. No abstract, method, conclusion, citation, acknowledgments, footnotes-- no submission for peer review of any kind. Seems thrown-together by someone trying to sound sciencey.
I think they use Luxembourg because it helps to suspend disbelief. Because even if you don't see magnetic effects on vaxxed people in your own country, who's to say that the shots in Luxembourg aren't different somehow? How many of you know somebody in Luxembourg who can replicate this experiment for us?
it is because the study was cancelled half way through, if you had read it to the end you would have known. you cant publish a scientific paper on a aborted study, so they just released their raw documentation
I did read that part. But that info doesn't make the article more or less believable. There simply isn't enough information to confirm or deny the study's findings, and the format still makes the information feel suspect, sudden cancelation of the study notwithstanding.