it is because the study was cancelled half way through, if you had read it to the end you would have known. you cant publish a scientific paper on a aborted study, so they just released their raw documentation
I did read that part. But that info doesn't make the article more or less believable. There simply isn't enough information to confirm or deny the study's findings, and the format still makes the information feel suspect, sudden cancelation of the study notwithstanding.
it is because the study was cancelled half way through, if you had read it to the end you would have known. you cant publish a scientific paper on a aborted study, so they just released their raw documentation
I did read that part. But that info doesn't make the article more or less believable. There simply isn't enough information to confirm or deny the study's findings, and the format still makes the information feel suspect, sudden cancelation of the study notwithstanding.