It is a target, that has been rewritten into a title, meant to instill confidence, and further peoples desire to receive these vaccines.
This target has most likely already failed based on basic principles(deaths), and are as likely to cause the mRNA vaccines to go into total recall, as they are to require another 8 years of testing.
The current clot shot is approved for emergency use only and Pfizer and friends have a "no liability" waiver in place. If it is FDA approved for non emergency use, will the "can't sue me" waiver remain in force? Just wondering...
They already HAVE full legal immunity for "approved" vaccines. The waiver was only because an unapproved treatment was outside the scope of the previous liability free agreement.
It is a target, that has been rewritten into a title, meant to instill confidence, and further peoples desire to receive these vaccines.
This target has most likely already failed based on basic principles(deaths), and are as likely to cause the mRNA vaccines to go into total recall, as they are to require another 8 years of testing.
The current clot shot is approved for emergency use only and Pfizer and friends have a "no liability" waiver in place. If it is FDA approved for non emergency use, will the "can't sue me" waiver remain in force? Just wondering...
That goes for all vaccines and has been that way since the 1980s.
This reaffirms my choice to not voulenteer to take the clot shot like a good sheep. Thanks.
It is imperative that if they flirt with tyranny, that they find out it shortens their life expectancy.
They already HAVE full legal immunity for "approved" vaccines. The waiver was only because an unapproved treatment was outside the scope of the previous liability free agreement.
This reaffirms my choice to not voulenteer to take the clot shot like a good sheep. Thanks.
...so yes , they will keep their legal immunity after FDA approval.
You can not sue a pharm company for adverse reactions to vaccination of any kind.
Utter corruption