She is obviously in Italy speaking to an Italian audience. The predominant religion in Italy is Christianity. People in Italy being raised as Christians would have an understanding of satan and his influence over human beings, more so then if she was making references to other deities or using terminology from other religions. She is speaking as would be expected within the cultural context of her society.
I am not sure what you mean. She is not trying to speak in metaphors, what she is saying is absolutely true. If you do not understand what is going on at this point you are willingly trying to deny the truth.
There is a higher power behind the creation of all existence, and the Christian mythos is the closest to being correct. That is why so many flock to its teachings
Modern Christians do not worship any emperors as godly beings. Strawman Argument.
Apophenia: "is the tendency to perceive meaningful connections between unrelated things...to imply a human propensity to seek patterns in random information, such as gambling" and is not the appropriate word to apply to my statements seeing as my previous statement does not claim God exists based off any real world observations, my statement assumed God exists and then claimed modern Christianity is closest to understanding that idea. Ad Hominum Argument.
Your final argument is basically "Look at this other religion has been around longer" implying that they must be more correct based off the fact its been around longer ? False Cause Argument.
Fact is some of the smartest and influential people in all of known history were scientists who also believed in God. I would continue this debate if you didn't clearly come off as completely disingenuous. Disingenuous because you are making straw-men arguments and clearly argue out of contempt, and not further your own understanding nor to further others understanding. Good day to you
Through all the religions there is a base element of good versus evil.
Good being equal to "cause no harm to others" and evil being equal to "do what you want to others".
Going back to the original "religions" there are moral lessons to be found. Yes, the thieves have corrupted the original meanings of the lessons for their own purposes, but that does not mean one should disregard the entire item because of the selfish need for control by psychopaths.
She is obviously in Italy speaking to an Italian audience. The predominant religion in Italy is Christianity. People in Italy being raised as Christians would have an understanding of satan and his influence over human beings, more so then if she was making references to other deities or using terminology from other religions. She is speaking as would be expected within the cultural context of her society.
I am not sure what you mean. She is not trying to speak in metaphors, what she is saying is absolutely true. If you do not understand what is going on at this point you are willingly trying to deny the truth.
There is a higher power behind the creation of all existence, and the Christian mythos is the closest to being correct. That is why so many flock to its teachings
Modern Christians do not worship any emperors as godly beings. Strawman Argument.
Apophenia: "is the tendency to perceive meaningful connections between unrelated things...to imply a human propensity to seek patterns in random information, such as gambling" and is not the appropriate word to apply to my statements seeing as my previous statement does not claim God exists based off any real world observations, my statement assumed God exists and then claimed modern Christianity is closest to understanding that idea. Ad Hominum Argument.
Your final argument is basically "Look at this other religion has been around longer" implying that they must be more correct based off the fact its been around longer ? False Cause Argument.
Fact is some of the smartest and influential people in all of known history were scientists who also believed in God. I would continue this debate if you didn't clearly come off as completely disingenuous. Disingenuous because you are making straw-men arguments and clearly argue out of contempt, and not further your own understanding nor to further others understanding. Good day to you
Through all the religions there is a base element of good versus evil. Good being equal to "cause no harm to others" and evil being equal to "do what you want to others".
Going back to the original "religions" there are moral lessons to be found. Yes, the thieves have corrupted the original meanings of the lessons for their own purposes, but that does not mean one should disregard the entire item because of the selfish need for control by psychopaths.
You sound just like the pronoun police.
Hmm! Great point here. Uncertain why she would mention this and not the others.
She's italian..Christianity is in the Italian psyche
Makes sense.