There is a higher power behind the creation of all existence, and the Christian mythos is the closest to being correct. That is why so many flock to its teachings
So, the mythos that was stolen from Egyptians by the Babylonians and then by Jews from Babylonians, and finally by Romans from the Jews.... and in each stage rewritten to portray the winners and their emperors as Godly beings.... that is your closest source of being correct?
That's a definition of apophenia, if I've ever seen one.
At least the Hindus, with their own delusions, have a few thousand years on this "new kid on the block" mythos....
Modern Christians do not worship any emperors as godly beings. Strawman Argument.
Apophenia: "is the tendency to perceive meaningful connections between unrelated things...to imply a human propensity to seek patterns in random information, such as gambling" and is not the appropriate word to apply to my statements seeing as my previous statement does not claim God exists based off any real world observations, my statement assumed God exists and then claimed modern Christianity is closest to understanding that idea. Ad Hominum Argument.
Your final argument is basically "Look at this other religion has been around longer" implying that they must be more correct based off the fact its been around longer ? False Cause Argument.
Fact is some of the smartest and influential people in all of known history were scientists who also believed in God. I would continue this debate if you didn't clearly come off as completely disingenuous. Disingenuous because you are making straw-men arguments and clearly argue out of contempt, and not further your own understanding nor to further others understanding. Good day to you
All judaic offshoot religions are theocratic. Learn the basics, please. Whh do presidents and prime ministers bow to god and why do you think in these religions yhe ruler was said to derive power from god?
Claim of Apophenia is not an ad hominem argument. IF I called you a retard, that would be an ad hominem. Learn reasoning fallacies 101 before you play the game
Again wrong, not a false cause argument. The only claim that was done, is the proven fact that another religion's mythos is older (while still being deluded)
Through all the religions there is a base element of good versus evil.
Good being equal to "cause no harm to others" and evil being equal to "do what you want to others".
Going back to the original "religions" there are moral lessons to be found. Yes, the thieves have corrupted the original meanings of the lessons for their own purposes, but that does not mean one should disregard the entire item because of the selfish need for control by psychopaths.
There is a higher power behind the creation of all existence, and the Christian mythos is the closest to being correct. That is why so many flock to its teachings
LOL.
So, the mythos that was stolen from Egyptians by the Babylonians and then by Jews from Babylonians, and finally by Romans from the Jews.... and in each stage rewritten to portray the winners and their emperors as Godly beings.... that is your closest source of being correct?
That's a definition of apophenia, if I've ever seen one.
At least the Hindus, with their own delusions, have a few thousand years on this "new kid on the block" mythos....
Modern Christians do not worship any emperors as godly beings. Strawman Argument.
Apophenia: "is the tendency to perceive meaningful connections between unrelated things...to imply a human propensity to seek patterns in random information, such as gambling" and is not the appropriate word to apply to my statements seeing as my previous statement does not claim God exists based off any real world observations, my statement assumed God exists and then claimed modern Christianity is closest to understanding that idea. Ad Hominum Argument.
Your final argument is basically "Look at this other religion has been around longer" implying that they must be more correct based off the fact its been around longer ? False Cause Argument.
Fact is some of the smartest and influential people in all of known history were scientists who also believed in God. I would continue this debate if you didn't clearly come off as completely disingenuous. Disingenuous because you are making straw-men arguments and clearly argue out of contempt, and not further your own understanding nor to further others understanding. Good day to you
All judaic offshoot religions are theocratic. Learn the basics, please. Whh do presidents and prime ministers bow to god and why do you think in these religions yhe ruler was said to derive power from god?
Claim of Apophenia is not an ad hominem argument. IF I called you a retard, that would be an ad hominem. Learn reasoning fallacies 101 before you play the game
Again wrong, not a false cause argument. The only claim that was done, is the proven fact that another religion's mythos is older (while still being deluded)
You really need to learn the basics
Through all the religions there is a base element of good versus evil. Good being equal to "cause no harm to others" and evil being equal to "do what you want to others".
Going back to the original "religions" there are moral lessons to be found. Yes, the thieves have corrupted the original meanings of the lessons for their own purposes, but that does not mean one should disregard the entire item because of the selfish need for control by psychopaths.
You sound just like the pronoun police.