She is obviously in Italy speaking to an Italian audience. The predominant religion in Italy is Christianity. People in Italy being raised as Christians would have an understanding of satan and his influence over human beings, more so then if she was making references to other deities or using terminology from other religions. She is speaking as would be expected within the cultural context of her society.
I am not sure what you mean. She is not trying to speak in metaphors, what she is saying is absolutely true. If you do not understand what is going on at this point you are willingly trying to deny the truth.
I agree that one should read it as a narrative and treat it as such, which was exactly my point.
I just find it funny that so many take it literally as a proof of their pet religion bed time story.
The amount of crap right now on fora about 2nd coming of antichrist as a literal belief is way beyond even normal levels of biblical belief insanity.
What these people do not get that even their pet belief is a narrative ripped off a narrative that was even older. All made to control you through your belief.
And this or that video is NOT a proof of tha particular religious silly story, more than it is of another religious control story.
They are all just that: control stories for people who want to BELIEVE and want to have a predigezted narrative. A PsyOp. A way to mask a conspiracy as something that it is not.
There is a higher power behind the creation of all existence, and the Christian mythos is the closest to being correct. That is why so many flock to its teachings
So, the mythos that was stolen from Egyptians by the Babylonians and then by Jews from Babylonians, and finally by Romans from the Jews.... and in each stage rewritten to portray the winners and their emperors as Godly beings.... that is your closest source of being correct?
That's a definition of apophenia, if I've ever seen one.
At least the Hindus, with their own delusions, have a few thousand years on this "new kid on the block" mythos....
Modern Christians do not worship any emperors as godly beings. Strawman Argument.
Apophenia: "is the tendency to perceive meaningful connections between unrelated things...to imply a human propensity to seek patterns in random information, such as gambling" and is not the appropriate word to apply to my statements seeing as my previous statement does not claim God exists based off any real world observations, my statement assumed God exists and then claimed modern Christianity is closest to understanding that idea. Ad Hominum Argument.
Your final argument is basically "Look at this other religion has been around longer" implying that they must be more correct based off the fact its been around longer ? False Cause Argument.
Fact is some of the smartest and influential people in all of known history were scientists who also believed in God. I would continue this debate if you didn't clearly come off as completely disingenuous. Disingenuous because you are making straw-men arguments and clearly argue out of contempt, and not further your own understanding nor to further others understanding. Good day to you
All judaic offshoot religions are theocratic. Learn the basics, please. Whh do presidents and prime ministers bow to god and why do you think in these religions yhe ruler was said to derive power from god?
Claim of Apophenia is not an ad hominem argument. IF I called you a retard, that would be an ad hominem. Learn reasoning fallacies 101 before you play the game
Again wrong, not a false cause argument. The only claim that was done, is the proven fact that another religion's mythos is older (while still being deluded)
Through all the religions there is a base element of good versus evil.
Good being equal to "cause no harm to others" and evil being equal to "do what you want to others".
Going back to the original "religions" there are moral lessons to be found. Yes, the thieves have corrupted the original meanings of the lessons for their own purposes, but that does not mean one should disregard the entire item because of the selfish need for control by psychopaths.
Always this biblical Christian mythos though.
Why not Djinns?
Why not Dybbuk?
Rakshasa?
Why does it have to be a Christian satanic entity, LOL :-D
She is obviously in Italy speaking to an Italian audience. The predominant religion in Italy is Christianity. People in Italy being raised as Christians would have an understanding of satan and his influence over human beings, more so then if she was making references to other deities or using terminology from other religions. She is speaking as would be expected within the cultural context of her society.
Yes, and she is believing as if it is literally true and not a metaphor.
Big difference.
I am not sure what you mean. She is not trying to speak in metaphors, what she is saying is absolutely true. If you do not understand what is going on at this point you are willingly trying to deny the truth.
I agree that one should read it as a narrative and treat it as such, which was exactly my point.
I just find it funny that so many take it literally as a proof of their pet religion bed time story.
The amount of crap right now on fora about 2nd coming of antichrist as a literal belief is way beyond even normal levels of biblical belief insanity.
What these people do not get that even their pet belief is a narrative ripped off a narrative that was even older. All made to control you through your belief.
And this or that video is NOT a proof of tha particular religious silly story, more than it is of another religious control story.
They are all just that: control stories for people who want to BELIEVE and want to have a predigezted narrative. A PsyOp. A way to mask a conspiracy as something that it is not.
That is the shiny object.
Don't fall for it.
There is a higher power behind the creation of all existence, and the Christian mythos is the closest to being correct. That is why so many flock to its teachings
LOL.
So, the mythos that was stolen from Egyptians by the Babylonians and then by Jews from Babylonians, and finally by Romans from the Jews.... and in each stage rewritten to portray the winners and their emperors as Godly beings.... that is your closest source of being correct?
That's a definition of apophenia, if I've ever seen one.
At least the Hindus, with their own delusions, have a few thousand years on this "new kid on the block" mythos....
Modern Christians do not worship any emperors as godly beings. Strawman Argument.
Apophenia: "is the tendency to perceive meaningful connections between unrelated things...to imply a human propensity to seek patterns in random information, such as gambling" and is not the appropriate word to apply to my statements seeing as my previous statement does not claim God exists based off any real world observations, my statement assumed God exists and then claimed modern Christianity is closest to understanding that idea. Ad Hominum Argument.
Your final argument is basically "Look at this other religion has been around longer" implying that they must be more correct based off the fact its been around longer ? False Cause Argument.
Fact is some of the smartest and influential people in all of known history were scientists who also believed in God. I would continue this debate if you didn't clearly come off as completely disingenuous. Disingenuous because you are making straw-men arguments and clearly argue out of contempt, and not further your own understanding nor to further others understanding. Good day to you
All judaic offshoot religions are theocratic. Learn the basics, please. Whh do presidents and prime ministers bow to god and why do you think in these religions yhe ruler was said to derive power from god?
Claim of Apophenia is not an ad hominem argument. IF I called you a retard, that would be an ad hominem. Learn reasoning fallacies 101 before you play the game
Again wrong, not a false cause argument. The only claim that was done, is the proven fact that another religion's mythos is older (while still being deluded)
You really need to learn the basics
Through all the religions there is a base element of good versus evil. Good being equal to "cause no harm to others" and evil being equal to "do what you want to others".
Going back to the original "religions" there are moral lessons to be found. Yes, the thieves have corrupted the original meanings of the lessons for their own purposes, but that does not mean one should disregard the entire item because of the selfish need for control by psychopaths.
You sound just like the pronoun police.
Hmm! Great point here. Uncertain why she would mention this and not the others.
She's italian..Christianity is in the Italian psyche
Makes sense.