AKA "you will own nothing and you will be happy" model.
Economically efficient for sure. Only problem is the owners can choose to terminate service at any point, if they don't like you. What if you have no alternatives?
This is not as economically efficient as capitalism! They just claim it is on CNN.
What this model does is give them power over you. They can live with the lower efficiency.
The problem of service denial has already started in the form of being denied the right to free speech online, but it is most certainly not the only problem with this way of doing things.
AKA "you will own nothing and you will be happy" model.
Economically efficient for sure. Only problem is the owners can choose to terminate service at any point, if they don't like you. What if you have no alternatives?
This is not as economically efficient as capitalism! They just claim it is on CNN.
What this model does is give them power over you. They can live with the lower efficiency.
The problem of service denial has already started in the form of being denied the right to free speech online, but it is most certainly not the only problem with this way of doing things.