When I changed the title to read "Many on the internet learned of Ibragim Todashev" from it's original of "TIL", I did mean to include myself in that category of people. As I have just learned of it today, having only caught glimpses of his face yesterday on 4chan.
The above is a Wikipedia link, elsewhere in this thread you will finds links to reddit and Christopher Bollyn's news blog. I suggest you investigate those links for more information on this topic.
Don't forget, they were there to question this guy not just about the Boston Bombings, but also the triple homicide of his friends who were found dead from a "robbery" where all three throats were slashed, and their bodies covered in weed and money...
I watched a great video a long time ago where this guy took all of the footage available of the "bombing" and slowed it down and compared clips to other clips and it's very obvious it's a bunch of crisis actors. Not surprisingly that video did not last very long on YouTube. I wish I could find it again.
The title reads, "He was a friend of one of the Boston Bombers." So the hidden premise is that Ibragim Todashev's friend was partly to blame for the Boston Marathon Bombing.
I've seen it in a couple of places, so it got my attention as a possible attempt to bypass peoples' critical thinking.
Is that the point he made? Because he said none of those things. He implied a hidden meaning in the title from me or the person who originally created it.
If you carefully reread what I wrote, it was, "...Ibragim Todashev's friend was partly to blame..." The point being that the hidden premise I was pointing out is that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was, in fact, one of the Boston Bombers. See how hard it is to spot?
That said, it's probably unnecessary to address the rest of your post, but I will due to its tone.
One does not cover up a shooting if the victim is responsible for a terrorist attack.
If it was a murder or due process was egregiously violated, of course they might cover it up.
Nobody in any of the communities...believes the narrative you are pushing...the title somehow gaslighting people into believing he was responsible for his own death, as it implies that he was a terrorist?
That's where you may have gotten the idea that I am acting in bad faith. That is not what I am trying to say at all. My conjecture is that the title is part of a psychological operation to instill the belief that Tamerlan Tsarnaev is guilty of being a "Boston Bomber."
Further, you can't know whether or not everybody in a community believes something, and even if your generalization were true that would be argumentum ad populum--the fallacy that something is true or false based on popular belief.
Don't forget the part about him being handcuffed and restrained when he "attacked."
With a broom handle...
Then they couldnt say who it was who shot Todashev because transparency
As we know, the bombing was a staged false flag. What could Todashev have said to cause the agent to eliminate him from testifying later?
If you ever get brought in by FBI, clam up and lawyer up.
Hes on the list
https://i.redd.it/hxeu0ucmfs741.jpg
Was this from the Rogan episode?
Is there a good Boston Bomber doc out there?
When I changed the title to read "Many on the internet learned of Ibragim Todashev" from it's original of "TIL", I did mean to include myself in that category of people. As I have just learned of it today, having only caught glimpses of his face yesterday on 4chan.
The above is a Wikipedia link, elsewhere in this thread you will finds links to reddit and Christopher Bollyn's news blog. I suggest you investigate those links for more information on this topic.
Don't forget, they were there to question this guy not just about the Boston Bombings, but also the triple homicide of his friends who were found dead from a "robbery" where all three throats were slashed, and their bodies covered in weed and money...
I watched a great video a long time ago where this guy took all of the footage available of the "bombing" and slowed it down and compared clips to other clips and it's very obvious it's a bunch of crisis actors. Not surprisingly that video did not last very long on YouTube. I wish I could find it again.
Note the hidden premise in the title of this post: that the people the government blame for the Boston Marathon Bombing are the actual perpetrators.
Hidden premise? Prominent theories of the current day, says the FBI and CIA are responsible for many false flag events.
The title reads, "He was a friend of one of the Boston Bombers." So the hidden premise is that Ibragim Todashev's friend was partly to blame for the Boston Marathon Bombing.
I've seen it in a couple of places, so it got my attention as a possible attempt to bypass peoples' critical thinking.
You are either playing devils advocate, or playing the fool.
One does not cover up a shooting if the victim is responsible for a terrorist attack.
Nobody in any of the communities that cover theories, where this title is prominent, as I cut and pasted it from elsewhere, believes the narrative you are pushing. Which leads to the Question, why are you pushing it? In fact, you are actively replying to a comment that outright tells you what the premise for this submission is, and yet, you move forward with your theory on the title somehow gaslighting people into believing he was responsible for his own death, as it implies that he was a terrorist?
No, seriously, what are you doing here now?
Are you painting me into a corner?
Are you painting yourself into a corner?
Are you just providing a soundboard for me to bounce ideas off of, so that I won't go mad from the sound of my own keys being pressed?
What color paint even is it?
Is it melancholy flavored paint?
I bet it's melancholy flavored. It must leave a most grievous after taste.
Protip: Don't eathepaintchips!
Never eat the paint chips, they are filled with lead!
https://www.bollyn.com/did-the-fbi-murder-ibragim-todashev/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VIOTkN57uucp/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/O1FPW9WnIrXl/
Hes making a valid point,
Which is, the Tsarnaev’s didnt “bomb” anything.
It was a planned mass casualty drill, and FEMA deputy admin Richard Serino was the incident commander
Is that the point he made? Because he said none of those things. He implied a hidden meaning in the title from me or the person who originally created it.
If you carefully reread what I wrote, it was, "...Ibragim Todashev's friend was partly to blame..." The point being that the hidden premise I was pointing out is that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was, in fact, one of the Boston Bombers. See how hard it is to spot?
That said, it's probably unnecessary to address the rest of your post, but I will due to its tone.
If it was a murder or due process was egregiously violated, of course they might cover it up.
That's where you may have gotten the idea that I am acting in bad faith. That is not what I am trying to say at all. My conjecture is that the title is part of a psychological operation to instill the belief that Tamerlan Tsarnaev is guilty of being a "Boston Bomber."
Further, you can't know whether or not everybody in a community believes something, and even if your generalization were true that would be argumentum ad populum--the fallacy that something is true or false based on popular belief.
Your remaining questions don't seem serious.