We actually have receptor sites designed for cannabis. They work to deliver all sorts of healing. Not at all how petrol based Rx interacts with receptor sites.
In the US these legal changes came about at the same time as prohibition was removed. And the Rockefeller Foundation was creating big pharma. The AMA objected, horrified that it meant all they'd have to use was petroleum based. Before that everything they used was cannabis based. They lost.
It's only a bad argument if you misuse it as you are doing. This isn't a discussion trying to overturn prohibition that I'm engaging in.
I'm not imagining any evolutionary purpose. Saying a receptor is compatible with cannabis but is not a cannabis receptor is hair splitting to a ridiculous degree. There's a reason why healing benefits from this plant are especially effective.
You have no clue what you are talking about. For almost the entire history of the United states cannabis was used more widely than aspirin is today.
It was smoked by our founding father's and literally required to be grown for its industrial purposes several times throughout this countries history.
You have no clue what you are talking about that is why you can't point to anything concrete and say stupid things like cannabis has no side effects. Do you even know what a side effect is? Because it's like all side effect when you smoke cannabis and doctors have even come up for a name for this phenomenon called the entourage effect.
smoking anything is bad for you. inhaling burning maple leaves is bad for you.
another conspiracy theory? ... or truth?
We are literally engineered physiologically to interact with cannabis.
See the endocannabinoid system.
That is gross teleology, that complex functionality in the natural world which looks designed is evidence of an intelligent creator.
lol I’m sorry my answer offended you.
jk I’m not.
Regardless of the argument of how it became to be, my statement, though tongue-in-cheek, is true.
I hope that helps unruffled your pseudo-intellectual pedantic panties, cupcake.
Definitely truth. The only question is how to use it, who, for what, how much, etc.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endocannabinoid_system
Includes some important info for this conversation
The manipulation of the profile is used to deliver very specific results.
We actually have receptor sites designed for cannabis. They work to deliver all sorts of healing. Not at all how petrol based Rx interacts with receptor sites.
In the US these legal changes came about at the same time as prohibition was removed. And the Rockefeller Foundation was creating big pharma. The AMA objected, horrified that it meant all they'd have to use was petroleum based. Before that everything they used was cannabis based. They lost.
It's only a bad argument if you misuse it as you are doing. This isn't a discussion trying to overturn prohibition that I'm engaging in.
I'm not imagining any evolutionary purpose. Saying a receptor is compatible with cannabis but is not a cannabis receptor is hair splitting to a ridiculous degree. There's a reason why healing benefits from this plant are especially effective.
Rank stinking teleology - to ask why of nature.
Excuse me but asking why is the very basis of logic and reason. Without that we accomplish nothing.
Although your response has nothing to do with my comment.
One might wonder why and from where the concept of teleology comes? Have you any formal training in logic / philosophy? Thought not.
You're far too old to be such an idiotic jerk. Aren't you supposed to shun icky?
If its legal its probably bad now.
Maybe in moderation.
Rarely.
Stuff with no side effects usually has no effect at all. Yes, cannabis is bad.
Look to the traditional cannabis cultures, ALL Third World SHIT Holes.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence of harm.
You have no clue what you are talking about. For almost the entire history of the United states cannabis was used more widely than aspirin is today.
It was smoked by our founding father's and literally required to be grown for its industrial purposes several times throughout this countries history.
You have no clue what you are talking about that is why you can't point to anything concrete and say stupid things like cannabis has no side effects. Do you even know what a side effect is? Because it's like all side effect when you smoke cannabis and doctors have even come up for a name for this phenomenon called the entourage effect.
I know I've been smoking weed since high school. I've never had a cold. I've had the flu once in my life at 31.
I can count on one hand all the times in my life I haven't felt 100% normal / fine.
Weed is the only plant that you can cut the top foot off a plant, plant that cut and it will grow a new plant = positive cell regeneration.
It's why they give it to MS / cancer / parkinsons patients. It promotes positive cell growth / regeneration in your body.
If you check the data, regular weed smokers don't succumb to cell degenerate diseases and ailments. NOBODY I know that smokes regular ever gets sick.
Almost every plant can be propagated by vegetative cuttings... trees, ornamentals, herbs, vegetables, etc.
It's not the only plant that grows like that.
It could also be an improved immune system from sharing blunts and bongs with friends lol. I don't smoke and I never get sick BTW
lol