Consent to the suggested -ism caused the conflict of reason between truth versus lies; good versus bad, and true versus false.
Prevent any of the above by choosing implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false).
dual
There's no "two" of anything; each ONE (potential) is different within ALL (potentiality), because flow (potentiality) segregates itself into form (potential), which represents a momentum (form) within motion (flow) aka a balance based on coexisting opposites within the same source.
Flow is defined by the beginning and end of it; so beginning and end (two) represent flow (one), and within beginning (inception) and end (death) of ongoing flow exists temporary form (life). Flow/form represent internal loss/growth of energy aka the source of ALL information aka the ONEness of ALL.
42
The Way gave birth to one.
One gave birth to two.
Two gave birth to three.
Three gave birth to all things.
All things carry yin and embrace yang.
They reach harmony by blending with the vital breath.
What people loathe the most
Is to be orphaned, desolate, unworthy.
But this is what princes and kings call themselves.
Sometimes gain comes from losing,
And sometimes loss comes from gaining.
What others have taught, I also teach:
The forceful and violent will not die from natural causes.
This will be my chief doctrine.
42nd verse of the Tao Te Ching...I wonder if Douglas Adams knew this one?
-ism contradicts that; because to consent to believe it represents to ignore the singular (flow) for the suggestions made by one within the plural (form).
beauty and ugliness must count as a single principle
"eye of the beholder" allegory aka the highest value in existence is ONEs free will of choice to evaluate ALL offered. Form evaluates for the sustenance of self, not to brand other form within flow. The latter ignores flow; which corrupts the former.
each pole
A parasite inversion tricking us to reason among poles (form); while ignoring that perceiving the measurement from one to another represents ongoing flow.
Void, nothingness
As ONE within ALL (form within flow) you perceive everything; yet you choose to believe the suggestion of others within form about "nothingness"; while ignoring that you cannot perceive nothing ; while existing within everything.
the only place where infinity is possible
What defines the infinity of flow (ongoing) is the finite form within (temporary). For ONE potential; ALL potentiality is infinite. Your lack of comprehension (potential) defines the unlimited potentiality offered to your perception...if you woudl choose to adhere to it instead of believing the suggestions of others.
Possibility represents the growth potential of ONE within the predefined potentiality (loss) of ALL. Flow (loss); form (growth)...together they represent self sustenance aka the function of energy as the source of ALL information.
infinite chance is bound to nothingness.
Yes...only consent to believe in nothingness upholds belief in chance (effects of unknown causes). Form represents the response to flow (momentum of motion); so form cannot perceive (knowledge) unknown causes...only choose to ignore it; which in return corrupts ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived.
0 = 0(x)
Consent to believe in suggested nothingness (0) equals death (x); while ignoring the sustenance of life (1)
Consent to the suggested -ism caused the conflict of reason between truth versus lies; good versus bad, and true versus false.
Prevent any of the above by choosing implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false).
There's no "two" of anything; each ONE (potential) is different within ALL (potentiality), because flow (potentiality) segregates itself into form (potential), which represents a momentum (form) within motion (flow) aka a balance based on coexisting opposites within the same source.
Flow is defined by the beginning and end of it; so beginning and end (two) represent flow (one), and within beginning (inception) and end (death) of ongoing flow exists temporary form (life). Flow/form represent internal loss/growth of energy aka the source of ALL information aka the ONEness of ALL.
42nd verse of the Tao Te Ching...I wonder if Douglas Adams knew this one?
TTC is the most influential book on my life I have ever read in my life.
-ism contradicts that; because to consent to believe it represents to ignore the singular (flow) for the suggestions made by one within the plural (form).
"eye of the beholder" allegory aka the highest value in existence is ONEs free will of choice to evaluate ALL offered. Form evaluates for the sustenance of self, not to brand other form within flow. The latter ignores flow; which corrupts the former.
A parasite inversion tricking us to reason among poles (form); while ignoring that perceiving the measurement from one to another represents ongoing flow.
As ONE within ALL (form within flow) you perceive everything; yet you choose to believe the suggestion of others within form about "nothingness"; while ignoring that you cannot perceive nothing ; while existing within everything.
What defines the infinity of flow (ongoing) is the finite form within (temporary). For ONE potential; ALL potentiality is infinite. Your lack of comprehension (potential) defines the unlimited potentiality offered to your perception...if you woudl choose to adhere to it instead of believing the suggestions of others.
Possibility represents the growth potential of ONE within the predefined potentiality (loss) of ALL. Flow (loss); form (growth)...together they represent self sustenance aka the function of energy as the source of ALL information.
Yes...only consent to believe in nothingness upholds belief in chance (effects of unknown causes). Form represents the response to flow (momentum of motion); so form cannot perceive (knowledge) unknown causes...only choose to ignore it; which in return corrupts ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived.
Consent to believe in suggested nothingness (0) equals death (x); while ignoring the sustenance of life (1)
It's not too good or too bad. It just is. Embrace it. You don't need to convince yourself of anything. The mind at peace knows.