Consent to the suggested -ism caused the conflict of reason between truth versus lies; good versus bad, and true versus false.
Prevent any of the above by choosing implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false).
dual
There's no "two" of anything; each ONE (potential) is different within ALL (potentiality), because flow (potentiality) segregates itself into form (potential), which represents a momentum (form) within motion (flow) aka a balance based on coexisting opposites within the same source.
Flow is defined by the beginning and end of it; so beginning and end (two) represent flow (one), and within beginning (inception) and end (death) of ongoing flow exists temporary form (life). Flow/form represent internal loss/growth of energy aka the source of ALL information aka the ONEness of ALL.
Consent to the suggested -ism caused the conflict of reason between truth versus lies; good versus bad, and true versus false.
Prevent any of the above by choosing implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false).
There's no "two" of anything; each ONE (potential) is different within ALL (potentiality), because flow (potentiality) segregates itself into form (potential), which represents a momentum (form) within motion (flow) aka a balance based on coexisting opposites within the same source.
Flow is defined by the beginning and end of it; so beginning and end (two) represent flow (one), and within beginning (inception) and end (death) of ongoing flow exists temporary form (life). Flow/form represent internal loss/growth of energy aka the source of ALL information aka the ONEness of ALL.