They can talk about whatever they want. Free speech kinda works that way. When TDW users start rioting in the streets burning down cities and attacking people for thinking differently, then you can talk shit. Until then 1st amendment rules apply.
First, the First Amendment only protects you from the government impeding on your speech. Private citizens can judge them for the violent, anti-American losers they are.
Second:
rioting in the streets burning down cities and attacking people for thinking differently
— you mean like January 6th, Trump rallies, and mask protests?
Well how would you like it if Trump supporters started rioting like BLM? Would that be acceptable? Also show me some statistics on how many people get hurt at a Trump rally vs. BLM riot. Also how many buildings have Trump supporters burned down? Could you give me more info on Jan 6th I couldn't find any evidence of any Trump supporters killing or burning or even attacking people for thinking differently.
He has a point. Although it's another account of more bullshit bashing Trump, because he is an Iranian nigger.
Although this is why, there is little expectancy in what happens on any audit. What is the truth? The truth is there is a president. Perhaps there is another claiming otherwise. Invalid when they arent the legal president. Even if you had proof, it isn't legal. There is a presumed illegitimate president, requiring impeachment. Who will hang, as the scapegoat, if there are irregularities. Obviously keyword, scapegoat. Can't go, starting, civil wars. Although it is the least they'd actually deserve, a firing squad. But if irregularities are found, it still needs impeachment. Or the constitution changes, as in a new amendment would be formed for an illegitimate election, it isn't simply redacted.
Any scapegoats, would be those on ground level. The balloters. The counters. The counting machines. Not the Senate acting on face value. Obviously leaving the question hanging over the current admin what happens next. But constitutionally it is only impeachment. Another process. A process not attempted for an illegitimate election. What is an illegitimate election. There is still a president by hook or by crook requiring impeachment.
Treason is punishable by hanging or firing squad. All people here do is match the crime with the punishment. Don't the the crime if you can't handle the consequences.
Who is the scapegoat? Not the Senate taking the election at face value. Not a president being wrongfully elected because the result was treated as fact. Fact it remains until impeachment. Will impeachment even work? Iligetimate election results after office has been sworn in by the senate. Is a oxymoron. If they later impeach for ilegitamacy.
What happens? Hopefully justice does. But what is that truth.
The SOS and AG that allowed the unconstitutional election "laws" pass in the first place. Also the judges who ruled on them as well. Really anyone that had anything to do with election meddling is a traitor. If it's not the senate then it's everyone who knowingly presented them the false election results.
Proving that is impossible. Of course there is a conspiracy if indeed it is proved illegitimate. Then there would be impeachment.
However what would be that cost? Think about it. America is suddenly irrelevant. It cannot be trusted. What are you asking to prove? You are asking for public lynchings in an irrelevant nation. No longer the leader of democracy instead a republic of corruption. It cannot even elected a president.
What is the truth? It won't be answered easily. If indeed the truth that is, there is a president, is still in doubt.
u/newuserfromreddit: And on your red.dit its users were talking about subjecting Trump supporters to just the same. Also red.dit commies were talking about harming or taking children of conservatives. And were promoting "denouncing" and rejecting conservative family members -case of infamous Helen Duke promoted on red.dit - young woman being in fact American version of Pavlik Morozow is just the example.
So simply : fuck you and go back to your red.dit supporting pedophiles (like for example formed red.dit moderator Ghislaine Maxwell) you commie piece of shit !
They can talk about whatever they want. Free speech kinda works that way. When TDW users start rioting in the streets burning down cities and attacking people for thinking differently, then you can talk shit. Until then 1st amendment rules apply.
First, the First Amendment only protects you from the government impeding on your speech. Private citizens can judge them for the violent, anti-American losers they are.
Second:
— you mean like January 6th, Trump rallies, and mask protests?
Well how would you like it if Trump supporters started rioting like BLM? Would that be acceptable? Also show me some statistics on how many people get hurt at a Trump rally vs. BLM riot. Also how many buildings have Trump supporters burned down? Could you give me more info on Jan 6th I couldn't find any evidence of any Trump supporters killing or burning or even attacking people for thinking differently.
No one cares you shabbo, find a better movement and support them
Idk, everyone he seems to keep talking about how peaceful Trump supporters were — seems an awful lot like they care.
He has a point. Although it's another account of more bullshit bashing Trump, because he is an Iranian nigger.
Although this is why, there is little expectancy in what happens on any audit. What is the truth? The truth is there is a president. Perhaps there is another claiming otherwise. Invalid when they arent the legal president. Even if you had proof, it isn't legal. There is a presumed illegitimate president, requiring impeachment. Who will hang, as the scapegoat, if there are irregularities. Obviously keyword, scapegoat. Can't go, starting, civil wars. Although it is the least they'd actually deserve, a firing squad. But if irregularities are found, it still needs impeachment. Or the constitution changes, as in a new amendment would be formed for an illegitimate election, it isn't simply redacted.
Any scapegoats, would be those on ground level. The balloters. The counters. The counting machines. Not the Senate acting on face value. Obviously leaving the question hanging over the current admin what happens next. But constitutionally it is only impeachment. Another process. A process not attempted for an illegitimate election. What is an illegitimate election. There is still a president by hook or by crook requiring impeachment.
Treason is punishable by hanging or firing squad. All people here do is match the crime with the punishment. Don't the the crime if you can't handle the consequences.
Who is the scapegoat? Not the Senate taking the election at face value. Not a president being wrongfully elected because the result was treated as fact. Fact it remains until impeachment. Will impeachment even work? Iligetimate election results after office has been sworn in by the senate. Is a oxymoron. If they later impeach for ilegitamacy.
What happens? Hopefully justice does. But what is that truth.
The SOS and AG that allowed the unconstitutional election "laws" pass in the first place. Also the judges who ruled on them as well. Really anyone that had anything to do with election meddling is a traitor. If it's not the senate then it's everyone who knowingly presented them the false election results.
Proving that is impossible. Of course there is a conspiracy if indeed it is proved illegitimate. Then there would be impeachment.
However what would be that cost? Think about it. America is suddenly irrelevant. It cannot be trusted. What are you asking to prove? You are asking for public lynchings in an irrelevant nation. No longer the leader of democracy instead a republic of corruption. It cannot even elected a president.
What is the truth? It won't be answered easily. If indeed the truth that is, there is a president, is still in doubt.
u/newuserfromreddit: And on your red.dit its users were talking about subjecting Trump supporters to just the same. Also red.dit commies were talking about harming or taking children of conservatives. And were promoting "denouncing" and rejecting conservative family members -case of infamous Helen Duke promoted on red.dit - young woman being in fact American version of Pavlik Morozow is just the example.
So simply : fuck you and go back to your red.dit supporting pedophiles (like for example formed red.dit moderator Ghislaine Maxwell) you commie piece of shit !