Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

36
COVID Jab Postmortem Finds ‘Viral RNA In Nearly All Organs’ (www.thelastamericanvagabond.com)
posted 4 years ago by DavidColeIntrepid 4 years ago by DavidColeIntrepid +37 / -1
15 comments share
15 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (15)
sorted by:
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 4 years ago +13 / -1
▲ 8 ▼
– Questionable 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

So you are saying the terrible idea, was a terrible idea? I am shocked.

I mean, how could we have seen this coming?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1
▲ 7 ▼
– CakeonSight 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

Nothing to see here just a good ol Pharmageddon

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– HaiQueue 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Is this a correct use of PCR?

If you were really looking for evidence of the spike protein after the shot, wouldn't you also look for vascular damage?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1
▲ 1 ▼
– DavidColeIntrepid [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Is this a correct use of PCR

Yes. Why do assume it isn't?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– HaiQueue 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I didn't assume one way or another -- I was asking.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DavidColeIntrepid [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Yeah, it could be false positives but this is the information we have to go on.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1
▲ 0 ▼
– DavidColeIntrepid [S] 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

I could go on

Please do

results might suggest that the first vaccination induces immunogenicity but not sterile immunity."

They are blaming it on Covid-19 infection, not the jab.

How? They didn't say anything about the virus in your quoted text.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1
▲ 1 ▼
– NotLikeThis 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Du2wm5nhTXY&t=449s

tl;dr

Spike proteins are shearing off the transfected cells producing them and gathering in other organs, including ovaries. They are cytotoxic and causing all kinds of insane symptoms.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– DavidColeIntrepid [S] 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Why don't you FUCKING READ THE PAPER yourself:

I'm not the one pretending to be a doctor. Go ahead and explain what the fuck a "Ct" is then why you think it's missing. Along with whatever "going on" you were talking about.

did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms,

Yeah, that's "asymptomatic" which doesn't fucking exist. Those are false positives. What the fuck you think you're correct because you quote random shit? Let me get my doctor Seuss reference book over here because it clearly says

"One fish, two fish, red fish"

And so on in that fasion. So you can clearly see the "CT" values are absolutely fine. Anyone who says different is a "fAkE nEwS!" crying faggot.

Typical people of today ,expect everything to be spoonfed to them by others.

Or, you know, EVIDENCE instead of crying like a bitch. You do whatever you want though, pal.

Learn to fucking apply yourself.

I provided the study. What do you have? Feelings? Take it to your blog, kid.

They are blaming it on COVID-19

I don't see that

AND blaming that the BNT162b2 vaccine is not effective enough in protecting from death nor sterilizing against infection/transmission.

And nothing. And you're fucking wrong. Not only wrong, you're a damned liar. Shut up.

So you think you can randomly paste NIH papers? Anything in that bullshit paper is irrelevant.

Regardless, the paper is still crap as I stated above:

That's the problem. You didn't PROVE shit, kid. You're just talking.

wrong gene targets

"fAkE nEwS!!!"

too high

YOU'RE too high if you think crying "fAkE nEwS!" makes you correct at fucking all, child.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy