COVID Jab Postmortem Finds ‘Viral RNA In Nearly All Organs’
(www.thelastamericanvagabond.com)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
So you are saying the terrible idea, was a terrible idea? I am shocked.
I mean, how could we have seen this coming?
Doesn't produce the virus, that we know of, but two proteins SP1 and NP1
Nothing to see here just a good ol Pharmageddon
Is this a correct use of PCR?
If you were really looking for evidence of the spike protein after the shot, wouldn't you also look for vascular damage?
No it is not.
They had a Ct cut off at 45 cycles.
They would find anything anywhere.
The gene targets were just stupid.
Yes. Why do assume it isn't?
I didn't assume one way or another -- I was asking.
Yeah, it could be false positives but this is the information we have to go on.
That was a really bad study. Wrong PCr targets, too high Ct values, no Sanger sequencing... I could go on.
Authors conclude:
They are blaming it on Covid-19 infection, not the jab.
Please do
How? They didn't say anything about the virus in your quoted text.
Why don't you FUCKING READ THE PAPER yourself:
How many times do they have to spell it for you?
Typical people of today ,expect everything to be spoonfed to them by others.
Learn to fucking apply yourself.
They are blaming it on COVID-19 AND blaming that the BNT162b2 vaccine is not effective enough in protecting from death nor sterilizing against infection/transmission.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051011/
Regardless, the paper is still crap as I stated above: wrong gene targets RNA-dependent RNA polymeras (Target 1) and nucleopeptide (Target 2) (bad SARS-CoV-2 kit, there are over 40 available), too high Ct for sampling of pathological samples,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Du2wm5nhTXY&t=449s
tl;dr
Spike proteins are shearing off the transfected cells producing them and gathering in other organs, including ovaries. They are cytotoxic and causing all kinds of insane symptoms.
I'm not the one pretending to be a doctor. Go ahead and explain what the fuck a "Ct" is then why you think it's missing. Along with whatever "going on" you were talking about.
Yeah, that's "asymptomatic" which doesn't fucking exist. Those are false positives. What the fuck you think you're correct because you quote random shit? Let me get my doctor Seuss reference book over here because it clearly says
And so on in that fasion. So you can clearly see the "CT" values are absolutely fine. Anyone who says different is a "fAkE nEwS!" crying faggot.
Or, you know, EVIDENCE instead of crying like a bitch. You do whatever you want though, pal.
I provided the study. What do you have? Feelings? Take it to your blog, kid.
I don't see that
And nothing. And you're fucking wrong. Not only wrong, you're a damned liar. Shut up.
So you think you can randomly paste NIH papers? Anything in that bullshit paper is irrelevant.
That's the problem. You didn't PROVE shit, kid. You're just talking.
"fAkE nEwS!!!"
YOU'RE too high if you think crying "fAkE nEwS!" makes you correct at fucking all, child.