COVID Jab Postmortem Finds ‘Viral RNA In Nearly All Organs’ - Conspiracies

COVID Jab Postmortem Finds ‘Viral RNA In Nearly All Organs’ (www.thelastamericanvagabond.com)

posted 3 years ago by DavidColeIntrepid 3 years ago by DavidColeIntrepid +37 / -1

15 comments

15 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (15)

sorted by:

▲ 0 ▼

– DavidColeIntrepid [S] 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

I could go on

Please do

results might suggest that the first vaccination induces immunogenicity but not sterile immunity."

They are blaming it on Covid-19 infection, not the jab.

How? They didn't say anything about the virus in your quoted text.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– factdigger 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

Why don't you FUCKING READ THE PAPER yourself:

" did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died."

"On day 25, our patient tested SARS-CoV-2 positive by real-time PCR (RT-PCR), with a low cycle threshold (Ct) value indicating high virus load"

"the patient became infected from the patient in his hospital room"

"Both the Ct value measured in nasopharyngeal swab and values measured in formalin-fixed paraffinembedded autopsy specimens indicate viral load and suggest transmissibility"

"immunization against SARS-CoV-2 by vaccination appeared to reduce the severity of pathogenesis, especially with regard to severe lung disease, while viral RNA persisted in nasal swabs"

How many times do they have to spell it for you?

Typical people of today ,expect everything to be spoonfed to them by others.

Learn to fucking apply yourself.

They are blaming it on COVID-19 AND blaming that the BNT162b2 vaccine is not effective enough in protecting from death nor sterilizing against infection/transmission.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051011/

Regardless, the paper is still crap as I stated above: wrong gene targets RNA-dependent RNA polymeras (Target 1) and nucleopeptide (Target 2) (bad SARS-CoV-2 kit, there are over 40 available), too high Ct for sampling of pathological samples,

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– NotLikeThis 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Du2wm5nhTXY&t=449s

tl;dr

Spike proteins are shearing off the transfected cells producing them and gathering in other organs, including ovaries. They are cytotoxic and causing all kinds of insane symptoms.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– DavidColeIntrepid [S] 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

Why don't you FUCKING READ THE PAPER yourself:

I'm not the one pretending to be a doctor. Go ahead and explain what the fuck a "Ct" is then why you think it's missing. Along with whatever "going on" you were talking about.

did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms,

Yeah, that's "asymptomatic" which doesn't fucking exist. Those are false positives. What the fuck you think you're correct because you quote random shit? Let me get my doctor Seuss reference book over here because it clearly says

"One fish, two fish, red fish"

And so on in that fasion. So you can clearly see the "CT" values are absolutely fine. Anyone who says different is a "fAkE nEwS!" crying faggot.

Typical people of today ,expect everything to be spoonfed to them by others.

Or, you know, EVIDENCE instead of crying like a bitch. You do whatever you want though, pal.

Learn to fucking apply yourself.

I provided the study. What do you have? Feelings? Take it to your blog, kid.

They are blaming it on COVID-19

I don't see that

AND blaming that the BNT162b2 vaccine is not effective enough in protecting from death nor sterilizing against infection/transmission.

And nothing. And you're fucking wrong. Not only wrong, you're a damned liar. Shut up.

So you think you can randomly paste NIH papers? Anything in that bullshit paper is irrelevant.

Regardless, the paper is still crap as I stated above:

That's the problem. You didn't PROVE shit, kid. You're just talking.

wrong gene targets

"fAkE nEwS!!!"

too high

YOU'RE too high if you think crying "fAkE nEwS!" makes you correct at fucking all, child.

permalink parent save report block reply