Why don't you FUCKING READ THE PAPER yourself:

I'm not the one pretending to be a doctor. Go ahead and explain what the fuck a "Ct" is then why you think it's missing. Along with whatever "going on" you were talking about.

did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms,

Yeah, that's "asymptomatic" which doesn't fucking exist. Those are false positives. What the fuck you think you're correct because you quote random shit? Let me get my doctor Seuss reference book over here because it clearly says

"One fish, two fish, red fish"

And so on in that fasion. So you can clearly see the "CT" values are absolutely fine. Anyone who says different is a "fAkE nEwS!" crying faggot.

Typical people of today ,expect everything to be spoonfed to them by others.

Or, you know, EVIDENCE instead of crying like a bitch. You do whatever you want though, pal.

Learn to fucking apply yourself.

I provided the study. What do you have? Feelings? Take it to your blog, kid.

They are blaming it on COVID-19

I don't see that

AND blaming that the BNT162b2 vaccine is not effective enough in protecting from death nor sterilizing against infection/transmission.

And nothing. And you're fucking wrong. Not only wrong, you're a damned liar. Shut up.

So you think you can randomly paste NIH papers? Anything in that bullshit paper is irrelevant.

Regardless, the paper is still crap as I stated above:

That's the problem. You didn't PROVE shit, kid. You're just talking.

wrong gene targets

"fAkE nEwS!!!"

too high

YOU'RE too high if you think crying "fAkE nEwS!" makes you correct at fucking all, child.