It's still there. The article even says so. They just made it less prominent. It's not like they need to display it anyway. They have left wing NPCs repeating it for them.
Basically ICAN sued the CDC to get access to studies the CDC uses to determine whether vaccines are safe and/or have a link to autism.
According to the ICAN press release, “on the CDC’s list was a recent review by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), paid for by the CDC, which conducted a comprehensive review looking specifically for studies relating to whether DTaP does or does not cause autism. The IOM concluded it could not identify a single study to support DTaP does not cause autism. Instead, the only relevant study the IOM could identify found an association between DTaP and autism.”
Does anyone have links to papers and autism? Proving or disproving, either way.
Consent to believe in any suggested -ism and you give those who suggested it the authority to change it at will (their will); which they utilize to control those submitting their will by consenting to the suggestions.
All life has free will of choice upon perceived; because the foundation of life (form within flow) is balance (struggle) to uphold life over death by choice (need or want) of action aka form adapting to flow.
Since inception; the child communicates his needs (self sustenance) to the providing mother; while he learns to resist his wants (temptations) aka when he was provided enough to sustain his needs; at which point any communication to the mother becomes a temptation that transmutes mommies tummy into trouble (and her moot).
After birth (infancy towards childhood aka dependence towards independence) the child will have increased potential (comprehension) about his sole authority over self (free will) and a growing access to tools for expression of needs and wants. This is when milk being too cold or too hot becomes a lesson for balance of choice (for both the child and the parents); same with hunger and sore nipples.
consent
CONSENT, noun [Latin, to be of one mind, to agree; to think, feel or perceive. See Sense and Assent.] That represents an inversion of free will of choice...sole authority over self (free will) for mutual authority over what is being consented to. The trick is that to consent (by free will) to a suggestion (by free will of another) represents consent to ignore ones sole authority over self (free will) for the false authority under another (his free will).
Furthermore; if you put children and consent together you fell for the suggested "age of consent" debate; designed by our parasites to cause a conflict of reason about "when" a child can be exploited by a predator; which represents the distraction needed for the predator "to" exploit children.
A more prominent example is abortion (human blood sacrifice aka blood libel). First they suggest abortion, because they want blood, then they suggest the label "pro-choice" to those who consent to "abortion" by believing it, while branding those who consent by not-believing it as "pro-life".
While the two sides are stuck within the conflict of reason (division through suggestion) the abortion ritual is running for half a century undisturbed. Meanwhile; the few who ruthlessly exploit the ignorance of the many, even have the chutzpah to mock that mass ignorance for all with eyes to see...
Fiction - Pro-Life versus Pro-Choice
Reality - Life equals Choice
Back to age of consent...reasoning about age of consent by consenting to belief the suggested "age of consent" perpetuates the exploitation of children; while step by step legalizing the point where a child can be exploited...as if that is up for debate.
If anyone cares about children they would question the implication of calling it childhood innocence...adulthood guilt. Guess why pedophiles are attracted by innocence? Btw biggest aspect of child abuse? Neglect aka working all day; while pretending to do it so that the children can have a better life; while they're offered to the predators on a silver platter of ignorance (education; healthcare; capitalism; entertainment etc.)
I try to not suggest anything. I represent inspiration (need) and information (want)...the choice is on others to make. If you seek suggestion; you want information; which represents your choice to ignore adaptation to inspiration (need).
Paragraph 1 of the article: "Between Aug. 26 and 27, 2020, quietly and without fanfare, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) removed the heading “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” from the top of their vaccine safety webpage."
Paragraph 3: "Although the CDC deleted the heading, a subheading with the same message remains on the webpage."
Your comment isn't the dunk you think it is. The article is reasonably nuanced, it's not saying vaccines cause autism, it's saying that the CDC is full of shit when they say they can prove that they don't cause autism.
It's still there. The article even says so. They just made it less prominent. It's not like they need to display it anyway. They have left wing NPCs repeating it for them.
Basically ICAN sued the CDC to get access to studies the CDC uses to determine whether vaccines are safe and/or have a link to autism.
According to the ICAN press release, “on the CDC’s list was a recent review by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), paid for by the CDC, which conducted a comprehensive review looking specifically for studies relating to whether DTaP does or does not cause autism. The IOM concluded it could not identify a single study to support DTaP does not cause autism. Instead, the only relevant study the IOM could identify found an association between DTaP and autism.”
Does anyone have links to papers and autism? Proving or disproving, either way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Poling
Thank you
Those are all links to CDC summaries of the studies, not the full studies themselves.
Consent to believe in any suggested -ism and you give those who suggested it the authority to change it at will (their will); which they utilize to control those submitting their will by consenting to the suggestions.
Children can't give consent.
All life has free will of choice upon perceived; because the foundation of life (form within flow) is balance (struggle) to uphold life over death by choice (need or want) of action aka form adapting to flow.
Since inception; the child communicates his needs (self sustenance) to the providing mother; while he learns to resist his wants (temptations) aka when he was provided enough to sustain his needs; at which point any communication to the mother becomes a temptation that transmutes mommies tummy into trouble (and her moot).
After birth (infancy towards childhood aka dependence towards independence) the child will have increased potential (comprehension) about his sole authority over self (free will) and a growing access to tools for expression of needs and wants. This is when milk being too cold or too hot becomes a lesson for balance of choice (for both the child and the parents); same with hunger and sore nipples.
CONSENT, noun [Latin, to be of one mind, to agree; to think, feel or perceive. See Sense and Assent.] That represents an inversion of free will of choice...sole authority over self (free will) for mutual authority over what is being consented to. The trick is that to consent (by free will) to a suggestion (by free will of another) represents consent to ignore ones sole authority over self (free will) for the false authority under another (his free will).
Furthermore; if you put children and consent together you fell for the suggested "age of consent" debate; designed by our parasites to cause a conflict of reason about "when" a child can be exploited by a predator; which represents the distraction needed for the predator "to" exploit children.
A more prominent example is abortion (human blood sacrifice aka blood libel). First they suggest abortion, because they want blood, then they suggest the label "pro-choice" to those who consent to "abortion" by believing it, while branding those who consent by not-believing it as "pro-life".
While the two sides are stuck within the conflict of reason (division through suggestion) the abortion ritual is running for half a century undisturbed. Meanwhile; the few who ruthlessly exploit the ignorance of the many, even have the chutzpah to mock that mass ignorance for all with eyes to see...
Fiction - Pro-Life versus Pro-Choice
Reality - Life equals Choice
Back to age of consent...reasoning about age of consent by consenting to belief the suggested "age of consent" perpetuates the exploitation of children; while step by step legalizing the point where a child can be exploited...as if that is up for debate.
If anyone cares about children they would question the implication of calling it childhood innocence...adulthood guilt. Guess why pedophiles are attracted by innocence? Btw biggest aspect of child abuse? Neglect aka working all day; while pretending to do it so that the children can have a better life; while they're offered to the predators on a silver platter of ignorance (education; healthcare; capitalism; entertainment etc.)
I try to not suggest anything. I represent inspiration (need) and information (want)...the choice is on others to make. If you seek suggestion; you want information; which represents your choice to ignore adaptation to inspiration (need).
And here is the CDC claiming, without evidence, that the reason vaccines are linked to autism, is because autism causes vaccines.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Concerns/Autism/cdc2004pediatrics.html
Anyone who believes the CDC is a fucking gullible idiot ;)
Paragraph 1 of the article: "Between Aug. 26 and 27, 2020, quietly and without fanfare, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) removed the heading “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” from the top of their vaccine safety webpage."
Paragraph 3: "Although the CDC deleted the heading, a subheading with the same message remains on the webpage."
Your comment isn't the dunk you think it is. The article is reasonably nuanced, it's not saying vaccines cause autism, it's saying that the CDC is full of shit when they say they can prove that they don't cause autism.
It's fair to say it's a clickbait title.