Not at all. WTC 7 is such a non issue to anyone whos actually done any research into it and I dont know why "truthers" think its such a smoking gun.
Burning debris and giant chunks of the world trade center had fallen on top of and crashed into 7, which caused fires to break out throughout the building, and after hours and hours of sustaining severe structural damage and burning, it caved in on itself.
Theres a lot of suspicious things about 9/11, but this aint one of them.
Yea a 40 story building that wasn't hit by a plane and only had minor fires which proceeded to fall into it's own footprint in a clear controlled demolition is a non-issue. STFU faggot
Small fire? This building was directly under the twin towers, of which giant sections of it crashed in on top of it. I cant stress enough how utterly retarded "truthers" are for thinking this is some smoking gun. Take your own advice and shut up.
In that picture you posted, how many of those not only had a fire, but had severe structural damage as well from burning debris crashing into them? This is a MAJOR thing I dont think you guys are taking into consideration. Interesting how that picture shows the entire building structure of the other ones, but selectively chooses to zoom in on WTC7. The entire back of the building was cut in hard by falling debris.
The towers were full of asbestos. Was going to cost 10x original cost just to remediate (not remove). Project would've taken years.
This. I recall the cost was more than a billion dollars to remove the asbestos. They had used it everywhere.
Not at all. WTC 7 is such a non issue to anyone whos actually done any research into it and I dont know why "truthers" think its such a smoking gun.
Burning debris and giant chunks of the world trade center had fallen on top of and crashed into 7, which caused fires to break out throughout the building, and after hours and hours of sustaining severe structural damage and burning, it caved in on itself.
Theres a lot of suspicious things about 9/11, but this aint one of them.
Yea a 40 story building that wasn't hit by a plane and only had minor fires which proceeded to fall into it's own footprint in a clear controlled demolition is a non-issue. STFU faggot
Small fire? This building was directly under the twin towers, of which giant sections of it crashed in on top of it. I cant stress enough how utterly retarded "truthers" are for thinking this is some smoking gun. Take your own advice and shut up.
How does this negate anything I've said about WTC7?
In that picture you posted, how many of those not only had a fire, but had severe structural damage as well from burning debris crashing into them? This is a MAJOR thing I dont think you guys are taking into consideration. Interesting how that picture shows the entire building structure of the other ones, but selectively chooses to zoom in on WTC7. The entire back of the building was cut in hard by falling debris.