This post again assumes that there is such a thing as a virus with so-called spike proteins. Remember how a virus "supposedly" makes you ill: it injects its genetic material into the cell and replicates, destroying the cell in the process. This would be the first virus in history that also has a "deadly" protein coating! Ooo scary
When globalist institutions like the Salk Institute are talking about this "supposed mechanism" you know are being lead down the garden path. The same shit was done with 9/11 and thermite theories. "We lead our own opposition".
"Deadly spike protein" is a red herring for people who can't think logically. There may be a pathogen but there is no virus and therefore no "viral protein" causing damage. If it was, someone, somewhere would have isolated it. The purpose of this diversion is to re-enforce the "reality" of viruses in those who are looking outside the mainstream.
You assume fetal bovine serum is actually used in other vaccines, that said serum has not been modified by the manufacturer, and you ignore the effect of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium whatever tf that is. You also assume that the whole experiment is not intentional fraud to re-enforce the Covid narrative.
You also assume the vaccines are doing what they claim to be doing. The whole point of "vaccines" is to poison under the pretext of prevention. Why believe anything they are saying? Who cares whether they say they're modifying cells to create a protein? They could say anything. How are you going to prove otherwise?
As long as your foundation is a lie it doesn't matter what you build on top of it. It will still be nonsense.
A genetic sequence is not a pathogen. DNA is not a pathogen.
How did they establish that this virus is, in fact, a pathogen? And if it has not been established, then what conceivable relevancy does its genetic sequence have?
This study shows that whatever sequenced toxin is supposedly Sars Cov 2 causes multiple organ necrosis in animals that exhibit the same immune response as humans to said toxin.
False. They did not expose the animals exclusively to the sars-cov-2 particle. Therefore, the study does not, cannot show what you're suggesting. To say otherwise is illogical.
Instead, they exposed the animals to a litany of additional toxins simultaneously. So which toxin do you want to deal with? It doesn't matter because the symptoms could be from one, several, or all of them. And as explained previously, it doesn't even imply that any particular toxin is the same as the ones in the vaccine.
This post again assumes that there is such a thing as a virus with so-called spike proteins. Remember how a virus "supposedly" makes you ill: it injects its genetic material into the cell and replicates, destroying the cell in the process. This would be the first virus in history that also has a "deadly" protein coating! Ooo scary
When globalist institutions like the Salk Institute are talking about this "supposed mechanism" you know are being lead down the garden path. The same shit was done with 9/11 and thermite theories. "We lead our own opposition".
"Deadly spike protein" is a red herring for people who can't think logically. There may be a pathogen but there is no virus and therefore no "viral protein" causing damage. If it was, someone, somewhere would have isolated it. The purpose of this diversion is to re-enforce the "reality" of viruses in those who are looking outside the mainstream.
You assume fetal bovine serum is actually used in other vaccines, that said serum has not been modified by the manufacturer, and you ignore the effect of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium whatever tf that is. You also assume that the whole experiment is not intentional fraud to re-enforce the Covid narrative.
You also assume the vaccines are doing what they claim to be doing. The whole point of "vaccines" is to poison under the pretext of prevention. Why believe anything they are saying? Who cares whether they say they're modifying cells to create a protein? They could say anything. How are you going to prove otherwise?
As long as your foundation is a lie it doesn't matter what you build on top of it. It will still be nonsense.
A genetic sequence is not a pathogen. DNA is not a pathogen.
How did they establish that this virus is, in fact, a pathogen? And if it has not been established, then what conceivable relevancy does its genetic sequence have?
False. They did not expose the animals exclusively to the sars-cov-2 particle. Therefore, the study does not, cannot show what you're suggesting. To say otherwise is illogical.
Instead, they exposed the animals to a litany of additional toxins simultaneously. So which toxin do you want to deal with? It doesn't matter because the symptoms could be from one, several, or all of them. And as explained previously, it doesn't even imply that any particular toxin is the same as the ones in the vaccine.
So where is the useful information?
Most people can only cope with a stupid cartoon meme. Inject to infect.
But those who think and read appreciate your post.