This study shows that whatever sequenced toxin is supposedly Sars Cov 2 causes multiple organ necrosis in animals that exhibit the same immune response as humans to said toxin.
False. They did not expose the animals exclusively to the sars-cov-2 particle. Therefore, the study does not, cannot show what you're suggesting. To say otherwise is illogical.
Instead, they exposed the animals to a litany of additional toxins simultaneously. So which toxin do you want to deal with? It doesn't matter because the symptoms could be from one, several, or all of them. And as explained previously, it doesn't even imply that any particular toxin is the same as the ones in the vaccine.
The pine needle tea link that was shared here in last few hours.
Also from that link.
Jacques Attali was an advisor to François Mitterrand (former President of France) and wrote this in 1981:
“In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old man, because once he is over 60-65 years old, man lives longer than he produces and it costs society dearly.
Then the weak and then the useless who do not contribute anything to society because there will be more and more, and especially finally the stupid.
Euthanasia directed at these groups; euthanasia must be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases.
Of course, we will not be able to execute people or organize camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe that it is for their own good.
Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive. Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to stop abruptly rather than gradually deteriorate.
We won’t be able to pass intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine!
We will find something or cause it; a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the elderly, it does not matter, the weak and the fearful will succumb.
The stupid will believe it and ask to be treated. We will have taken care of having planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.
The selection of idiots will therefore be done by itself: they will go to the slaughterhouse alone. “ This fragment is excerpted from his book “Brief History of the Future”, published in France in 2006.”
False. They did not expose the animals exclusively to the sars-cov-2 particle. Therefore, the study does not, cannot show what you're suggesting. To say otherwise is illogical.
Instead, they exposed the animals to a litany of additional toxins simultaneously. So which toxin do you want to deal with? It doesn't matter because the symptoms could be from one, several, or all of them. And as explained previously, it doesn't even imply that any particular toxin is the same as the ones in the vaccine.
So where is the useful information?
Most people can only cope with a stupid cartoon meme. Inject to infect.
But those who think and read appreciate your post.
You did it. That's all you can do. yw and thanks too.
It's solutions time for the coming survivors. Shared with the remnant.
https://archives.simplelists.com/nfu/msg/16539359/
The pine needle tea link that was shared here in last few hours.
Also from that link.
Jacques Attali was an advisor to François Mitterrand (former President of France) and wrote this in 1981:
“In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old man, because once he is over 60-65 years old, man lives longer than he produces and it costs society dearly.
Then the weak and then the useless who do not contribute anything to society because there will be more and more, and especially finally the stupid.
Euthanasia directed at these groups; euthanasia must be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases.
Of course, we will not be able to execute people or organize camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe that it is for their own good.
Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive. Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to stop abruptly rather than gradually deteriorate.
We won’t be able to pass intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine!
We will find something or cause it; a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the elderly, it does not matter, the weak and the fearful will succumb.
The stupid will believe it and ask to be treated. We will have taken care of having planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.
The selection of idiots will therefore be done by itself: they will go to the slaughterhouse alone. “ This fragment is excerpted from his book “Brief History of the Future”, published in France in 2006.”
small epub file, that Book here:
https://ipfs.io/ipfs/bafykbzacedkyuhxzlpg2xgonpzfltpy4thlscqbooxjenl56ndp3hfpel5udy?filename=Attali%2C%20Jacques_Leggatt%2C%20Jeremy%20-%20A%20brief%20history%20of%20the%20future_%20a%20brave%20and%20controversial%20look%20at%20the%20twenty-first%20century-Skyhorse%20Publishing%2C%20Inc._Arcade%20Pub%20%282011%29.epub
youtube interview with Attalii
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIXUSo-IDW0