I agree it was misleading to use "inject" in that context.
This post is about how the inoculation of hamsters with Sars Cov 2 has the same side effects as the inoculation of humans with Sars Cov 2 even though the means of inoculation are slightly different.
As I understand it, these "vaccines" don't even contain the "virus". Or at least, the Moderna and Pfizer ones don't. They say they're using mrna to have body cells produce the viral spike protein. They're not challenging the immune system with viral particles directly like they used to.
So if they're not culturing anything, it's hard to imagine how this experiment and an mrna vaccine mediums would overlap. Even though the symptoms appear to be matching, it's possible to create the same collection of symptoms with different poisons. For example, if I test two different poisons that compromise blood cells I would expect to see tissue oxygen deprivation, degraded function, and associated lesions in both instances.
Basically, they've given poison to a hamster to create systemic damage. They then use the PCR test at 40 cycles to generate a false positive for sars-cov-2 in whatever part of the body they want to test. They can now point and say, "look at all the damage Covid caused!".
What about the vaccine symptoms then?
Do the vaccine and this experiment use the same poisons? Who knows! Manufactures are not divulging their methods.
Is that poison the sars-cov-2 particle? This experiment as designed gives us no clue one way or the other.
Therefore, the experiment cannot provide us with any information to help us speculate about vaccine damage! You should leave it up though, because discussions like these are useful.
This post again assumes that there is such a thing as a virus with so-called spike proteins. Remember how a virus "supposedly" makes you ill: it injects its genetic material into the cell and replicates, destroying the cell in the process. This would be the first virus in history that also has a "deadly" protein coating! Ooo scary
When globalist institutions like the Salk Institute are talking about this "supposed mechanism" you know are being lead down the garden path. The same shit was done with 9/11 and thermite theories. "We lead our own opposition".
"Deadly spike protein" is a red herring for people who can't think logically. There may be a pathogen but there is no virus and therefore no "viral protein" causing damage. If it was, someone, somewhere would have isolated it. The purpose of this diversion is to re-enforce the "reality" of viruses in those who are looking outside the mainstream.
You assume fetal bovine serum is actually used in other vaccines, that said serum has not been modified by the manufacturer, and you ignore the effect of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium whatever tf that is. You also assume that the whole experiment is not intentional fraud to re-enforce the Covid narrative.
You also assume the vaccines are doing what they claim to be doing. The whole point of "vaccines" is to poison under the pretext of prevention. Why believe anything they are saying? Who cares whether they say they're modifying cells to create a protein? They could say anything. How are you going to prove otherwise?
As long as your foundation is a lie it doesn't matter what you build on top of it. It will still be nonsense.
A genetic sequence is not a pathogen. DNA is not a pathogen.
How did they establish that this virus is, in fact, a pathogen? And if it has not been established, then what conceivable relevancy does its genetic sequence have?
This study shows that whatever sequenced toxin is supposedly Sars Cov 2 causes multiple organ necrosis in animals that exhibit the same immune response as humans to said toxin.
False. They did not expose the animals exclusively to the sars-cov-2 particle. Therefore, the study does not, cannot show what you're suggesting. To say otherwise is illogical.
Instead, they exposed the animals to a litany of additional toxins simultaneously. So which toxin do you want to deal with? It doesn't matter because the symptoms could be from one, several, or all of them. And as explained previously, it doesn't even imply that any particular toxin is the same as the ones in the vaccine.
I agree it was misleading to use "inject" in that context.
As I understand it, these "vaccines" don't even contain the "virus". Or at least, the Moderna and Pfizer ones don't. They say they're using mrna to have body cells produce the viral spike protein. They're not challenging the immune system with viral particles directly like they used to.
So if they're not culturing anything, it's hard to imagine how this experiment and an mrna vaccine mediums would overlap. Even though the symptoms appear to be matching, it's possible to create the same collection of symptoms with different poisons. For example, if I test two different poisons that compromise blood cells I would expect to see tissue oxygen deprivation, degraded function, and associated lesions in both instances.
Basically, they've given poison to a hamster to create systemic damage. They then use the PCR test at 40 cycles to generate a false positive for sars-cov-2 in whatever part of the body they want to test. They can now point and say, "look at all the damage Covid caused!".
What about the vaccine symptoms then? Do the vaccine and this experiment use the same poisons? Who knows! Manufactures are not divulging their methods. Is that poison the sars-cov-2 particle? This experiment as designed gives us no clue one way or the other.
Therefore, the experiment cannot provide us with any information to help us speculate about vaccine damage! You should leave it up though, because discussions like these are useful.
This post again assumes that there is such a thing as a virus with so-called spike proteins. Remember how a virus "supposedly" makes you ill: it injects its genetic material into the cell and replicates, destroying the cell in the process. This would be the first virus in history that also has a "deadly" protein coating! Ooo scary
When globalist institutions like the Salk Institute are talking about this "supposed mechanism" you know are being lead down the garden path. The same shit was done with 9/11 and thermite theories. "We lead our own opposition".
"Deadly spike protein" is a red herring for people who can't think logically. There may be a pathogen but there is no virus and therefore no "viral protein" causing damage. If it was, someone, somewhere would have isolated it. The purpose of this diversion is to re-enforce the "reality" of viruses in those who are looking outside the mainstream.
You assume fetal bovine serum is actually used in other vaccines, that said serum has not been modified by the manufacturer, and you ignore the effect of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium whatever tf that is. You also assume that the whole experiment is not intentional fraud to re-enforce the Covid narrative.
You also assume the vaccines are doing what they claim to be doing. The whole point of "vaccines" is to poison under the pretext of prevention. Why believe anything they are saying? Who cares whether they say they're modifying cells to create a protein? They could say anything. How are you going to prove otherwise?
As long as your foundation is a lie it doesn't matter what you build on top of it. It will still be nonsense.
A genetic sequence is not a pathogen. DNA is not a pathogen.
How did they establish that this virus is, in fact, a pathogen? And if it has not been established, then what conceivable relevancy does its genetic sequence have?
False. They did not expose the animals exclusively to the sars-cov-2 particle. Therefore, the study does not, cannot show what you're suggesting. To say otherwise is illogical.
Instead, they exposed the animals to a litany of additional toxins simultaneously. So which toxin do you want to deal with? It doesn't matter because the symptoms could be from one, several, or all of them. And as explained previously, it doesn't even imply that any particular toxin is the same as the ones in the vaccine.
So where is the useful information?