If Fievel Mousekewitz represents a so called jew, then the suggested actions of the Chinese military could be seen as highly antisemitic. Yet, what if the suggestion (dailymail-uk) originates from Tavistock (uk); which operates from within the City of London (an alleged nation/corporation aka 'The Crown' run by so called jews)?
Sometimes they seem like they are on our side and sometimes they poop in the punch bowl.
The sides represent the conflict of reason (truth versus false), which is based on consenting to believe a suggestion. The few a) offer those suggestions; in exchange for consent to belief, to use the conflict of reason for division, and b) they utilize the media (among everything else) to suggest contradictions to both sides of the conflict of reason aka to those who believe truth/false and to those who do not.
Controlling division (reason) through contradiction is called talmudic reasoning. Reason is based on belief; and belief is based on consent to suggestions made by others, for which one ignores nature. it is nature that offers ALL, and it is ONEs free will of choice within that needs to consent to it...not to the suggestions of another ONE within ALL.
Tavistock utilizes international news-wire to propagated the agreed upon suggestion from the few to the many, and whatever the many choose to consent to, will then be supplied with contradictions to keep the suggestion (belief) and the resulting division (reason) going. Why? Because those who consent to the suggestion of other ONEs are ignoring ALL while doing so, which allows the few who make the suggestions to steer the ignorance of the many in every which way they choose to.
If Fievel Mousekewitz represents a so called jew, then the suggested actions of the Chinese military could be seen as highly antisemitic. Yet, what if the suggestion (dailymail-uk) originates from Tavistock (uk); which operates from within the City of London (an alleged nation/corporation aka 'The Crown' run by so called jews)?
Two sides of the same bagel?
The sides represent the conflict of reason (truth versus false), which is based on consenting to believe a suggestion. The few a) offer those suggestions; in exchange for consent to belief, to use the conflict of reason for division, and b) they utilize the media (among everything else) to suggest contradictions to both sides of the conflict of reason aka to those who believe truth/false and to those who do not.
Controlling division (reason) through contradiction is called talmudic reasoning. Reason is based on belief; and belief is based on consent to suggestions made by others, for which one ignores nature. it is nature that offers ALL, and it is ONEs free will of choice within that needs to consent to it...not to the suggestions of another ONE within ALL.
Tavistock utilizes international news-wire to propagated the agreed upon suggestion from the few to the many, and whatever the many choose to consent to, will then be supplied with contradictions to keep the suggestion (belief) and the resulting division (reason) going. Why? Because those who consent to the suggestion of other ONEs are ignoring ALL while doing so, which allows the few who make the suggestions to steer the ignorance of the many in every which way they choose to.